Law School Discussion

Poll

.

.
0 (0%)
.
0 (0%)

Total Members Voted: 0

.

.
« on: March 23, 2006, 02:16:11 AM »
:)

Fidelio

Re: Georgia v. Randolph. Roberts Dissents
« Reply #1 on: March 23, 2006, 02:38:16 AM »
I disagree with SCOTUS on this. 


Especially with domestic violence cases when one party would deny the Police from entering and the other party wants the Police to enter.



Fidelio

Re: Georgia v. Randolph. Roberts Dissents
« Reply #2 on: March 23, 2006, 02:57:51 AM »
why does it look like you just voted for yes?


I jumped the gun.. :-[

Fidelio

Re: Georgia v. Randolph. Roberts Dissents
« Reply #3 on: March 23, 2006, 03:01:20 AM »

Freak

  • ****
  • 4767
  • What's your agenda?!
    • AOL Instant Messenger - smileyill4663
    • Yahoo Instant Messenger - smileyill
    • View Profile
Re: Georgia v. Randolph. Roberts Dissents
« Reply #4 on: March 23, 2006, 02:22:24 PM »
Entering is different than searching...

verbal

  • ****
  • 1951
    • AOL Instant Messenger - verbaltrinity
    • View Profile
Re: Georgia v. Randolph. Roberts Dissents
« Reply #5 on: March 23, 2006, 02:27:10 PM »
u know i just sat in on a law school class where the teacher was talking about a case where one lady gave consent and got her ex boyfriend arrested for drugs. i guess the class will have to disregard that case and learn this one for their test at the end of the year. what a coincidence. thats the only class ive sat in on and now the stuff i learned is useless.

Freak

  • ****
  • 4767
  • What's your agenda?!
    • AOL Instant Messenger - smileyill4663
    • Yahoo Instant Messenger - smileyill
    • View Profile
Re: Georgia v. Randolph. Roberts Dissents
« Reply #6 on: March 23, 2006, 03:12:51 PM »
u know i just sat in on a law school class where the teacher was talking about a case where one lady gave consent and got her ex boyfriend arrested for drugs. i guess the class will have to disregard that case and learn this one for their test at the end of the year. what a coincidence. thats the only class ive sat in on and now the stuff i learned is useless.

 :D :D :D :D

Freak

  • ****
  • 4767
  • What's your agenda?!
    • AOL Instant Messenger - smileyill4663
    • Yahoo Instant Messenger - smileyill
    • View Profile
Re: Georgia v. Randolph. Roberts Dissents
« Reply #7 on: March 23, 2006, 06:26:52 PM »
Not too bad; much less busy than 1L that's for sure.

As to your question, there are often reasons to enter a residence which do not give a right to search it for example exigent circumstances. Note also that an arrest warrant is less inclusive than a search warrant. If the police have an arrest warrant they may enter the suspects home and make an arrest but they aren't supposed to search the home. Furthermore, they cannot enter somebody else's home, if that somebody objects, with an arrest warrant.

Freak

  • ****
  • 4767
  • What's your agenda?!
    • AOL Instant Messenger - smileyill4663
    • Yahoo Instant Messenger - smileyill
    • View Profile
Re: Georgia v. Randolph. Roberts Dissents
« Reply #8 on: March 23, 2006, 07:40:10 PM »
okay, i modified the poll so that now it says SEARCH.  ;)

i am sad this hasn't taken off.  you'd think there would be more interest.  :(

glad things aren't too bad.  i was confused because i thought 2L's had it easy.  :D

A lot easier than IL's, maybe easier than 3L's. It depends on you're courses and other activities.

Fidelio

Re: Georgia v. Randolph. Roberts Dissents
« Reply #9 on: March 23, 2006, 09:19:28 PM »
okay, i modified the poll so that now it says SEARCH.  ;)

i am sad this hasn't taken off.  you'd think there would be more interest.  :(

glad things aren't too bad.  i was confused because i thought 2L's had it easy.  :D

and we went thru all that re-voting process earlier today....  :-\