read my post to alamo...
bush continued what bush sr. and clinton were doing...but he actually removed hussein...
aye suggest you read more about the kurds or should aye say...north iraq...
you must have no "media" access to stories of success in iraq.
aye live in the present...
aye agree with alamo that it is assinine to blame one man or one administration for the nation's problems...many posters do it all the time...bush this...and bush that...to me it sounds like a bunch of crybabies...all you can do is naysay...it still seems like democrats are wound licking. if the democratic party weren't so stupid and disorganized; picked "stronger stature" candidates...aye might be a democrat today...instead aye remain independent...
the us congress put us military in iraq back when bush sr. was in charge...we really have not left...clinton had to send planes into the region.
clinton did little for national security.
and after the first bombing "global crescentors" returned.
bush put the big "don't tread on me" flag and anthemed a tune called "national security"...and so far...no one has harmed a hair of an american on our soil...am aye right or not, adm?
writing about clinton to me is really passe...aye don't care that he was in charge...he was a good president in many many aspects...but he failed miserably on "national security and defense"...tragedy struck so bush is dealing with it...and so far it is a secure nation internally...too soon to tell? what does the present tell you?
my friend, remember...even death comes like a thief in the night.
living today is too soon to tell if you will be dead tomorrow?
Bush personally campaigned for war in Iraq. He presented very questionable information to congress, and deliberately mislead the American people as to Hussein's connections (or lack thereof) to Al Qaeda. Sure, Congress supported the war (except for Russ Feingold), but Bush lead the charge.
As for success in Iraq, yeah, it's happening here and there. However, if you're referring to the state of Iraq over all, well.. No. There's a reason Bush has started referring to it as "the long war."
Also, Iraq /= 9/11 terrorists/al qaeda. You completely passed over that and my response to your claims of reduced domestic terrorism in the United States.
cut the bull..."reduced domestic terrorism"
how many times have aye mentioned "terrorism"
how about not one hair on one american head has been harmed by "global crescentors" on american soil...
and reduced?...how about none...
reminder: we are in afghanistan..."the organisation" has been disrupted...funding, communications and operatives...not eliminated but disrupted...
many "global crescentors" went to iraq through syria...they are not coming here.
what do you attribute it to? cost of travel? or security?
those that were killed in iraq won't come here...
and aye don't connect 911 with iraq...although others purport that there has been contact (re: saudi arabia) between hussein and bin laden...aye am skeptical about this...
as far as flying airplanes into buildings? perhaps some of the dead "global crescenting pilots" chose going to iraq over coming here...
as far as "global crescenting guerrillas" are concerned...they see that the usa is taking the attack to them by going to afghanistan and by going to the area of mesopoetamia...they are on the defense now...even though we think of afghanistan and iraq as two separate nations...they do not...particularly iraq...
Discussion
Resources
