I agree CU had no culpability in the matter and doesn't have any obligation to inform her of her "chances of success" however i think the point she is trying to make is that she was not aware that she was unlikely to make it out of the bottom 5% and that CU should have made her aware.
That's cool how you referenced a case.
I'm so far from the end of my tether right now that I reckon I could knit myself some socks with the slack.
Doesn't it seem as if she's a shill for the Center for Individual Rights or something? There's something very suspicious about all of this, especially the fact that she has all these concerns and refuses to meet with people who could do something about them.