Law School Discussion

Poll

what's worse and why?

a guy who doesnt know how to dress himself
one who chooses not to but is able to when he wants

a

sno

  • ****
  • 278
  • run from this law bitches
    • AOL Instant Messenger - snobord99999
    • View Profile
a
« on: February 10, 2006, 11:37:16 AM »
a

AH

  • ****
  • 4985
  • but you're a hippo!
    • View Profile
    • LSN
    • Email
Re: veg brings up a good question (for me at least) for the ladies...
« Reply #1 on: February 10, 2006, 12:33:38 PM »
I voted!  But I'l give my reason here.

I don't like to babysit, so I prefer a guys who knows how to dress himself.  Since I walk around like a bum half the time, idc if he doesn't dress well, as long as he can when it counts.

Nothing worse than showing up at a guys house in full formal attire, then spending 20 minutes in a floor length gown getting him ready too.

florentino ariza

Re: veg brings up a good question (for me at least) for the ladies...
« Reply #2 on: February 10, 2006, 01:21:08 PM »
 :D

i'd say being able to dress up is good.

i look like a slob half the time, but at least i CAN dress up when needed.

except for ties. i hate ties.

veg

Re: veg brings up a good question (for me at least) for the ladies...
« Reply #3 on: February 10, 2006, 01:53:51 PM »
OK, seriously - a man who in UNABLE to dress himself well is way worse. There's nothing you can do with that!

A man who CHOOSES not to is fine, so long as he can step up when it's needed.

FossilJ

  • *****
  • 11330
  • Carbon-date THIS, biznitch!
    • View Profile
    • Cricket Rules!
    • Email
Re: veg brings up a good question (for me at least) for the ladies...
« Reply #4 on: February 10, 2006, 04:47:14 PM »
This thread is making me feel a lot better about my self-elected slothful attire.

Mr Shears

Re: veg brings up a good question (for me at least) for the ladies...
« Reply #5 on: February 10, 2006, 04:48:43 PM »
I dress up most of the time, so I'm not in either category.  I don't look good unless I'm dressed up.  :P

FossilJ

  • *****
  • 11330
  • Carbon-date THIS, biznitch!
    • View Profile
    • Cricket Rules!
    • Email
Re: veg brings up a good question (for me at least) for the ladies...
« Reply #6 on: February 10, 2006, 04:52:14 PM »
I can pull off at least one of each category and still look decent.  That makes me feel really good about myself. 

The categories are:

1.  Just underwear (well, not right now, but once I hit the gym again for a few weeks, then yes).
2.  Crappy sweats and a hat.
3.  Easy-going attire (jeans and a T-shirt).
4.  Semi-formal (nice pants with a belt, and a button-up shirt).
5.  Formal (suit or tux).

But I have to be very specific about what I wear, otherwise I could end up looking like the Down syndrome wannabe I really am.

Mr Shears

Re: veg brings up a good question (for me at least) for the ladies...
« Reply #7 on: February 10, 2006, 04:59:04 PM »
I can pull off at least one of each category and still look decent.  That makes me feel really good about myself. 

The categories are:

1.  Just underwear (well, not right now, but once I hit the gym again for a few weeks, then yes).
2.  Crappy sweats and a hat.
3.  Easy-going attire (jeans and a T-shirt).
4.  Semi-formal (nice pants with a belt, and a button-up shirt).
5.  Formal (suit or tux).

But I have to be very specific about what I wear, otherwise I could end up looking like the Down syndrome wannabe I really am.


I can do semi-formal and formal, as well as jujitsu/judo attire.  But that's only because I'm good.  :P

veg

Re: veg brings up a good question (for me at least) for the ladies...
« Reply #8 on: February 10, 2006, 06:20:45 PM »
Or, ya know, a buff guy who's just naked ;D

Seconded.

AH

  • ****
  • 4985
  • but you're a hippo!
    • View Profile
    • LSN
    • Email
Re: veg brings up a good question (for me at least) for the ladies...
« Reply #9 on: February 10, 2006, 06:23:42 PM »
Or, ya know, a buff guy who's just naked ;D

Seconded.


Thirded.

Though plain white boxers also work well.  leaving a tad to the imagination is hot imho.