Law School Discussion

.

.
« on: February 04, 2006, 03:02:55 PM »
.

tulpen

  • ****
  • 158
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Arguments Master List
« Reply #1 on: February 04, 2006, 03:19:01 PM »
I'll post!  I totally missed it. Maybe it should be renamed "post-mortem" or something like that?

tulpen

  • ****
  • 158
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Arguments Master List
« Reply #2 on: February 04, 2006, 03:20:05 PM »
Mahogany seeds-inference: I'm pretty sure it was something like seedlings wouldn't grow in an area full of mahogany trees.

tulpen

  • ****
  • 158
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Arguments Master List
« Reply #3 on: February 04, 2006, 03:20:38 PM »
Which is the Doctor Tyler one? I don't remember.

magnumalv

Re: Arguments Master List
« Reply #4 on: February 04, 2006, 03:22:52 PM »
Which is the Doctor Tyler one? I don't remember.

Dr Tyler revealing the mayors illness in the newspaper

tulpen

  • ****
  • 158
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Arguments Master List
« Reply #5 on: February 04, 2006, 03:23:36 PM »
was there one about the morality of a doctor disclosing the mayor's condition? I think the answer had to do with assuming that the there was no other way the newspaper found out about the mayor.

magnumalv

Re: Post Mortem Args Master list
« Reply #6 on: February 04, 2006, 03:26:43 PM »
i STILL don't remember that phoenician one

tulpen

  • ****
  • 158
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Post Mortem Args Master list
« Reply #7 on: February 04, 2006, 03:27:34 PM »
Can someone please elaborate on the below? I'm debating canceling and it all hinges on LR:

Parallel firing/secrets-CEO got car but not sales rep
Sea animals/octopus-parallel

THANKS!

4DClaw

  • ****
  • 812
    • View Profile
Re: Post Mortem Args Master list
« Reply #8 on: February 04, 2006, 03:28:30 PM »
How is this different than the other Post-mortem LR? Are we discussing them here now?

Re: Post Mortem Args Master list
« Reply #9 on: February 04, 2006, 03:29:00 PM »
I think I put that the doctor was responsible (or not) for the leak
Help me out. Do you remember anything in the stim about whether they mayors condition was a threat or not? If not, I think this was also a missing premise