well.... nyu's location is certainly better
Quote from: retake on February 01, 2006, 03:41:56 PMIf my assumptions are true, taking the money at the lesser school may make sense to a lot of people if they are paying for school themselves and if they take the time to think about it. First, the Cardozo Editor will probably get a very nice clerkship, the Columbia grad probably will not. The Cardozo Editor's best shot at teaching is at Cardozo, which isn't likely, but neither is the Columbia middle-of-the-roader. Even without a clerkship, they will both make the market rate for top graduates, $125. Someone point out what I'm missing.FWIW the experiences of people I know lead me to believe the name on your JD has implications beyond the first job after graduation. My sister graduated from Columbia in the middle of her class and her SO graduated from Rutgers at the top of his class. They both received $125K offers. Now with several years of experience under their belts, they've both been looking to change firms. My sister got an offer within a month. Her SO, who is highly respected at his firm, is having trouble even getting to the interview stage.
If my assumptions are true, taking the money at the lesser school may make sense to a lot of people if they are paying for school themselves and if they take the time to think about it. First, the Cardozo Editor will probably get a very nice clerkship, the Columbia grad probably will not. The Cardozo Editor's best shot at teaching is at Cardozo, which isn't likely, but neither is the Columbia middle-of-the-roader. Even without a clerkship, they will both make the market rate for top graduates, $125. Someone point out what I'm missing.
This is a funny discussion.I think its especially amusing that people care so much about location when these schools are less than 7 miles apart. Even in Manhattan, its only a 15-20 minute sub ride from one to the other.I don't think, within reason, location should matter that much. I mean, New Haven is more Detroit than Paris, but people sure seem to want to go there.
They both started their law careers at the same firm (they met on the job), i.e. no difference in prestige or area of practice. Their undergrads are comparable in terms of esteem/national recognition if that counts for anything: top 15 university vs. seven sisters. Also, sis has a Masters. The main difference is that her SO graduated from law school a couple of years earlier and thus has two additional years of experience in relation to her. My sister changed firms after her third year; her bf started looking around the same time with five-plus years exp. I haven't seen his resume, but he is extremely articulate and is a skilled writer (he was on law review) so I doubt that the problem is in the presentation.Anyhow, they both are of the opinion that he's not getting the good phone calls b/c his resume sinks lower in the pile compared to others who have similar legal experience but brand name schools. Naturally, the school you attend could very well have less impact the longer you've been out. I'm guessing the people you've spoken with were further along in their law careers when they changed firms?Another thought though on your post from yesterday: Assuming you knew for a fact that you wanted to practice in NY for the rest of your life, it might be possible to justify taking a full ride at Cardozo over Columbia. But say hypothetically that one day you're married to a god/goddess of a spouse who gets a job offer that's too good to decline in SF. Which one would you want on your resume?