Law School Discussion

Auntie Red's Wisdom for December LSAT Takers

Re: Auntie Red's Wisdom for December LSAT Takers
« Reply #90 on: June 03, 2007, 01:27:28 AM »
Not too early at all. Great thread. Thanks.

I'll definitely be reading this Monday morning.

PSA

  • ****
  • 212
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Auntie Red's Wisdom for December LSAT Takers
« Reply #91 on: June 04, 2007, 02:33:52 PM »
PSA: This thread should be renamed to include all administrations of the LSAT

Re: Auntie Red's Wisdom for December LSAT Takers
« Reply #92 on: November 29, 2007, 05:26:57 PM »
Quote
Inferences do not have to follow from the conclusion. They may flow from a single premise. Thatís a useful thing to remember.

What does this mean? Example(s)?

Re: Auntie Red's Wisdom for February LSAT Takers
« Reply #93 on: January 27, 2008, 05:13:26 PM »
Put this with Jeffort's advice from this week.

Remember that if you see three or four D's in a row then you have probably answered them all correctly. There is always one of these streaks throughout the test in one of the sections.

Always remember to reuse previous work on the LG section when the hypothetical list or group is relevant. Good Luck

Re: Auntie Red's Wisdom for December LSAT Takers
« Reply #94 on: January 27, 2008, 05:30:15 PM »
Quote
Inferences do not have to follow from the conclusion. They may flow from a single premise. Thatís a useful thing to remember.

What does this mean? Example(s)?

A -> B, B -> C, therefore A -> C.

You could infer from the stimulus: A -> B, B -> C, and A -> C, but only A -> C is the conclusion.

Re: Auntie Red's Wisdom for December LSAT Takers
« Reply #95 on: June 12, 2008, 10:38:35 PM »
bumping a damn fine thread