Well, I've read that he claims he THOUGHT he was taking copies, but that's not actually what he was accused of, in my understanding. I think there are actual documents missing, holes in the record, ORIGINALS. If I'm wrong on this, I'm wrong, but that's what I read the uproar about it is about a week or so ago when all this started coming up. If he did just take copies, obviously there's no issue other than that it's sloppy, and that says nothing about his integrity, only about his sloppiness. Clinton just kind of laughed the whole thing off... of course, Clinton just kind of laughs everything off, which is what I absolutely love about him. The man knows the game and how to play it better than anyone else. Utterly fascinating in my opinion.But getting back to Berger, if he really only did take copies, this is one hell of a smear piece. I realize it's slanted toward the right because I found it on Drudge, but if he took originals that's an objective fact that can't be slanted either left or right; and, I assume, a crime.ZAP
If they're not originals, I don't see what the big deal is about.
OK, for some reason I'd read somewhere that they were originals. Since I get all my news from the internet and don't watch TV, there's no telling WHERE I read that, or even if I just misinterpreted what I read. If they're not originals, I don't see what the big deal is about.ZAP
Page created in 0.18 seconds with 18 queries.