Quote from: Lily on February 21, 2006, 01:20:18 PMI can't speak for anyone else on the board, but I for one don't hate them for what they believe. Sure, I got irritated when my Christian friends in elementary and junior high tried to convert me, but we developed a rule that worked really well: I didn't push vegetarianism on them, and they didn't push their conception of God on me. (Of course, they wound up liking vegetarian food when I cooked it, and I like Renaissance art, but quality is quality regardless of ideology.)There are some people at my school that keep on trying to make me go to their church. I blew up on one of the guys today. I feel really bad but they should take no as an answer and stop trying to convert me. He was saying "You know the bible says that you should not call anybody Father besides your father and God. blah blah. Come to church with me." I finally said, "You know what? Just leave me the Fu*k alone. I tried to be nice by respecting your views, so please respect my views and religion.” To be honest, I felt like a jerk but there was no alternative. You would figure that after telling them no three times that it would give them the hint. Some people are just do not care for the private space of other people.
I can't speak for anyone else on the board, but I for one don't hate them for what they believe. Sure, I got irritated when my Christian friends in elementary and junior high tried to convert me, but we developed a rule that worked really well: I didn't push vegetarianism on them, and they didn't push their conception of God on me. (Of course, they wound up liking vegetarian food when I cooked it, and I like Renaissance art, but quality is quality regardless of ideology.)
That's because most of it is password protected now, Sam. You can verify that by clicking the links on the first few pages of this thread. The list of prohibitions and sactions on page two of this thread is a direct copy and paste.Regarding individual choice of where to attend law school and ABA accreditation, I totally agree with you. But these people are screaming to be made fun of. It will only do them good by feeding their thirst for persecution.
Quote from: SamE397 on February 26, 2009, 04:50:47 PMQuote from: Mister Pink on February 26, 2009, 04:18:01 PMThat's because most of it is password protected now, Sam. You can verify that by clicking the links on the first few pages of this thread. The list of prohibitions and sactions on page two of this thread is a direct copy and paste.Regarding individual choice of where to attend law school and ABA accreditation, I totally agree with you. But these people are screaming to be made fun of. It will only do them good by feeding their thirst for persecution.I could see why they would want to do that but that said am I supposed to just take peoples word for it that these things are on the site? Liberty may deserve to be made fun of a bit but I don't think they deserve to have un-verified information about their school circulated on the internet. Also, looking over their sexual misconduct clause again I did notice that along with banned actions normally considered sexual harassment it included pre-marital sex. I wonder if that's actually enforced dam that could be awful. I can tell you that I've seen it first-hand before it was password protected, and those items were listed there. Take my word for it or don't; that in no way affects the veracity of it. Just because it's locked down now, doesn't mean it isn't there, or has never been.
Quote from: Mister Pink on February 26, 2009, 04:18:01 PMThat's because most of it is password protected now, Sam. You can verify that by clicking the links on the first few pages of this thread. The list of prohibitions and sactions on page two of this thread is a direct copy and paste.Regarding individual choice of where to attend law school and ABA accreditation, I totally agree with you. But these people are screaming to be made fun of. It will only do them good by feeding their thirst for persecution.I could see why they would want to do that but that said am I supposed to just take peoples word for it that these things are on the site? Liberty may deserve to be made fun of a bit but I don't think they deserve to have un-verified information about their school circulated on the internet. Also, looking over their sexual misconduct clause again I did notice that along with banned actions normally considered sexual harassment it included pre-marital sex. I wonder if that's actually enforced dam that could be awful.