Law School Discussion

Nine Years of Discussion
;

Author Topic: Stanford DING!  (Read 23555 times)

ramman

  • Guest
Re: Stanford DING!
« Reply #20 on: January 19, 2006, 02:58:24 PM »
got dinged yesterday

postal007

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 242
  • Bite Me Fergie
    • View Profile
Re: Stanford DING!
« Reply #21 on: January 19, 2006, 07:57:18 PM »
http://www.lawschoolnumbers.com/display.php?user=jwilcox1024

Our own jwilcox got dinged.  Yes, with a 180.  I am scared.

Wow.. I guess that puts things in perspective.  Although I do feel bad for jwilcox.. that is a monster score, and I would have expected a better result.

ACK!

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 961
  • RESIST THE EARTHQUAKE! REUNITE GONDWANALAND!
    • View Profile
Re: Stanford DING!
« Reply #22 on: January 19, 2006, 07:58:01 PM »
http://www.lawschoolnumbers.com/display.php?user=jwilcox1024

Our own jwilcox got dinged.  Yes, with a 180.  I am scared.

Wow, now thatís a selective school.
U Chi '09

Steve.jd

  • LSD Obsessed
  • *****
  • Posts: 5313
  • I'm edumacated now, still not photogenic though
    • View Profile
Re: Stanford DING!
« Reply #23 on: January 19, 2006, 07:58:09 PM »
http://www.lawschoolnumbers.com/display.php?user=jwilcox1024

Our own jwilcox got dinged.  Yes, with a 180.  I am scared.

I am surprised although Stanford has been all about GPA this cycle, there are only 3 GPAS below 3.9 that have been accepted (and one of them is our very own JG who is just a beast ;) so that doesn't count!), and no one with a GPA below 3.8 has been accepted.

S's average GPA so far is a 3.94...
HLS '09

Pancho

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 397
    • View Profile
Re: Stanford DING!
« Reply #24 on: January 19, 2006, 07:58:22 PM »
http://www.lawschoolnumbers.com/display.php?user=jwilcox1024

Our own jwilcox got dinged.  Yes, with a 180.  I am scared.

Wow.. I guess that puts things in perspective.  Although I do feel bad for jwilcox.. that is a monster score, and I would have expected a better result.

Things like this and Goodfella Aaron's UMich ding make me wonder about the whole process. 

jwilcox1024

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 607
    • View Profile
Re: Stanford DING!
« Reply #25 on: January 19, 2006, 07:58:55 PM »
Wow, Pancho is quick. I just updated my LSN profile 2 or 3 minutes ago. I'm not too suprised. Other than my 180, all I brought to the table was a life as an average white guy from a forgettable undergrad.

I also keep on having a hard time posting this because all of you are providing so much instant commentary. :)
Goal: Penn, NYU, Duke, Michigan, Northwestern, Chicago
Pad Save: Columbia
Glove Save: Stanford

http://www.lawschoolnumbers.com/display.php?user=jwilcox1024

ACK!

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 961
  • RESIST THE EARTHQUAKE! REUNITE GONDWANALAND!
    • View Profile
Re: Stanford DING!
« Reply #26 on: January 19, 2006, 08:01:12 PM »
Wow, Pancho is quick. I just updated my LSN profile 2 or 3 minutes ago. I'm not too suprised. Other than my 180, all I brought to the table was a life as an average white guy from a forgettable undergrad.

I also keep on having a hard time posting this because all of you are providing so much instant commentary. :)

Sorry about it anyway dude. Iím sure youíll have some great options. 
U Chi '09

Pancho

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 397
    • View Profile
Re: Stanford DING!
« Reply #27 on: January 19, 2006, 10:32:20 PM »
Yeah, like, maybe it's not all just about the LSAT?  <gasp>

Ha, perhaps not everything, but it still retains its crown as "king."

txntrio

  • Guest
Re: Stanford DING!
« Reply #28 on: January 20, 2006, 07:43:54 PM »
Nothing like Jwilcox 180, but Stanford just dinged my 170.

I expected it, but, man, that first ding stings!!!!

txntrio

  • Guest
Re: Stanford DING!
« Reply #29 on: January 20, 2006, 10:02:26 PM »
Hey Tony,

I knew I could count on you for condolences.  I assume they got my updated transcript so I would be at a 3.87 (.03 below the benchmark) and a 170.  PM me when you get a chance if you heard anything more from UT.  Did you call them?

Mark