Law School Discussion

#13 - Thinking conceptually required for language

HOAH

  • ****
  • 111
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: #13 - Thinking conceptually required for language
« Reply #10 on: December 11, 2005, 07:31:14 PM »
Yeah, you're right.
The answer was a principle right?
People trying to bring about good results cannot be held responsible for bad consequences that they do not forsee.

HOAH

  • ****
  • 111
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: #13 - Thinking conceptually required for language
« Reply #11 on: December 11, 2005, 07:32:32 PM »
I dont remember one about a patient and diagnosis.

Re: #13 - Thinking conceptually required for language
« Reply #12 on: December 11, 2005, 07:34:16 PM »
I don't recall anything about a patient either. But the scientist/invention one was about unforeeable consequences, that one cannot be held responsible if some other people do bad things with something they discovered.

Re: #13 - Thinking conceptually required for language
« Reply #13 on: December 11, 2005, 07:38:42 PM »
yeah that, was the answer i got for the invention questoin--a principle, and i think the principle was what you said


the other question i was talking about was one in which they gave a principle and we had to pick which adhered to it

the principle was something about you should not forgo seeking info that could be bad and i put as my answer something about a patient should find out his diagnosis even if knowing it could have a negative effect on him potentially

i'm not confident about my choice--this and the language question are my two most controversial...but i know it was in fact one of the choices

i think someone mentioned somethign about withholding bidding prices at an auction in an earlier thread, but i didnt see a confirmed answer in ithe postmosterm

Re: #13 - Thinking conceptually required for language
« Reply #14 on: December 11, 2005, 08:00:16 PM »
anyone remember??

HOAH

  • ****
  • 111
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: #13 - Thinking conceptually required for language
« Reply #15 on: December 11, 2005, 08:07:55 PM »
Are you sure that wasnt experimental?
I really dont remember it.

Re: #13 - Thinking conceptually required for language
« Reply #16 on: December 11, 2005, 08:13:38 PM »
yeah i had experimental games, its on the master list here as number 39, check out the link...http://www.lawschooldiscussion.org/prelaw/index.php/topic,47927.0.html

i'm really not sure of my answer chioce, however

Re: #13 - Thinking conceptually required for language
« Reply #17 on: December 11, 2005, 08:14:46 PM »
and i think the question as it is in the link does not provide a consensus answer

HOAH

  • ****
  • 111
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: #13 - Thinking conceptually required for language
« Reply #18 on: December 11, 2005, 08:28:25 PM »
I got nothin'. Sorry.

Re: #13 - Thinking conceptually required for language
« Reply #19 on: December 11, 2005, 08:35:05 PM »
ha thats o.k. thanks anyway