Law School Discussion

Nine Years of Discussion
;

Author Topic: University of Texas Austin  (Read 5715 times)

Wild Hearted Son

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 64
  • 167, 3.5
    • View Profile
Re: University of Texas Austin
« Reply #20 on: December 07, 2005, 11:34:27 PM »
Well I am kinda bummed. Im not a texas resident though, so I'm sure thats why.
Guns n Roses: USD, Colorado, Loyola LA, Pepperdine($$)
Poison (WL): Nowhere
Michael Bolton: Texas, Georgetown, Michigan

shae

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 1155
    • View Profile
    • LSN
Re: University of Texas Austin
« Reply #21 on: December 23, 2005, 11:24:30 PM »
hey letmein i have been accepted to the exact same schools as u so far. i was actually debating sending a donation to texas this week but since your numbers r better than mine i think ill keep my money. sorry about the ding.

thanks for the condolences. i'll survive. burnt orange is an ugly color anyway. i hope you fare better w/ texas than i.

very true

Pancho

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 397
    • View Profile
Re: University of Texas Austin
« Reply #22 on: December 23, 2005, 11:55:59 PM »
I like the orange.  It's unique.

shae

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 1155
    • View Profile
    • LSN
Re: University of Texas Austin
« Reply #23 on: December 23, 2005, 11:59:26 PM »
haha- yeah; but I'm an Aggie- so i hate it (unless I go there for law school, then I'll like it unless they are playing A&M).

but for now i hate it.

Hobert

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 864
  • Rossi! Rossi! Rossi!
    • View Profile
Re: University of Texas Austin
« Reply #24 on: December 24, 2005, 12:56:25 PM »
I like the orange.  It's unique.

I have always liked it as well. I would like it even more if they would let me in  ;)
Super Bowl Champs (Attending): DUKE
TD: Michigan, Northwestern, UNC, Notre Dame, Texas, Vandy, WUSTL
Intentional Grounding(Withdrew): Baylor, Case, Cincy, Emory, Florida, Indiana
INT: None
4th and Goal: Penn, UVA
http://www.lawschoolnumbers.com/display.php?user=Hobert

Queen of Miami

  • Guest
Re: University of Texas Austin
« Reply #25 on: January 15, 2006, 10:22:13 PM »
Not having residency appears to put you a huge disadvantage when applying to Texas.

sarmstrong806

  • Guest
Re: University of Texas Austin
« Reply #26 on: January 15, 2006, 10:25:48 PM »
Not having residency appears to put you a huge disadvantage when applying to Texas.

It does, seeing as they can only take 20% out of state.

sarmstrong806

  • Guest
Re: University of Texas Austin
« Reply #27 on: January 16, 2006, 01:12:12 AM »
Not having residency appears to put you a huge disadvantage when applying to Texas.

It does, seeing as they can only take 20% out of state.

The limit's been raised to 35%, starting with this cycle.

OK Yeah, but it still has the same effect

shae

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 1155
    • View Profile
    • LSN
Re: University of Texas Austin
« Reply #28 on: January 16, 2006, 03:03:20 PM »
although they raised the limit, the ppl at UT made it sound like they werent planning on enrolling 35% of nonresidents right away (they may take a few years to reach that level).

SkullTatt

  • Guest
Re: University of Texas Austin
« Reply #29 on: January 24, 2006, 06:26:28 PM »
I don't think they are going to admit 35% non-residents this year for at least two reasons:

(1) The girl in the admissions office, when I called them to ask about the policy, went out of her way to say they COULD admit 35% now, but that doesn't mean they WOULD.

(2) If you look at LSN, Texas is quickly rejecting tons of people with good numbers even though their apps are down this cycle. I haven't checked the states of residence of all those people, but I'm willing to bet they aren't from Texas.