Law School Discussion

POST-MORTEM December '05 - Logical Reasoning

Re: POST-MORTEM December '05 - Logical Reasoning
« Reply #40 on: December 03, 2005, 12:32:06 PM »
If everyone sleeps better in a new environment, and the drugs were not effective, that's the only answer that addresses BOTH of the groups, which the question specifically asked for. The environment wouldn't have been NEW anymore to the insomniacs, and the drugs weren't helping anyway...

Re: POST-MORTEM December '05 - Logical Reasoning
« Reply #41 on: December 03, 2005, 12:32:17 PM »
i think i put that they could be genetically dissimalar but have the same common ancestor for the guinia pigs

Rooster

  • ****
  • 496
  • This dog has a tough life.
    • View Profile
Re: POST-MORTEM December '05 - Logical Reasoning
« Reply #42 on: December 03, 2005, 12:32:22 PM »
isnt it possible taht they just got a resistance to the sleeping pills? and why does after 2 weeks suddenly not fall into "new"

Brett McKay

  • ****
  • 225
  • The Frugal Law Student
    • View Profile
    • The Frugal Law Student
Re: POST-MORTEM December '05 - Logical Reasoning
« Reply #43 on: December 03, 2005, 12:32:25 PM »
i remember a question about you either vote or you don't that was parrallel reasoning. i put that it was similar to you run or you don't run

Re: POST-MORTEM December '05 - Logical Reasoning
« Reply #44 on: December 03, 2005, 12:33:00 PM »
What about the question pertaining to art and subtleties that was augmented with an anology about understanding the subleties of baseball would make people more prone to appreciate baseball?

Brett McKay

  • ****
  • 225
  • The Frugal Law Student
    • View Profile
    • The Frugal Law Student
Re: POST-MORTEM December '05 - Logical Reasoning
« Reply #45 on: December 03, 2005, 12:33:34 PM »
same here as well.

 what was the answer to the Trakaid, anti-locking brakes question?

i put that there was another car that used a different system that controlled wheel spin

Terabithia

  • ****
  • 711
  • Wondering and Wishing
    • View Profile
Re: POST-MORTEM December '05 - Logical Reasoning
« Reply #46 on: December 03, 2005, 12:33:41 PM »
what about the parrallel reasong question about the physicans??

Brett McKay

  • ****
  • 225
  • The Frugal Law Student
    • View Profile
    • The Frugal Law Student
Re: POST-MORTEM December '05 - Logical Reasoning
« Reply #47 on: December 03, 2005, 12:34:05 PM »
What about the question pertaining to art and subtleties that was augmented with an anology about understanding the subleties of baseball would make people more prone to appreciate baseball?

i don't remember that one

Re: POST-MORTEM December '05 - Logical Reasoning
« Reply #48 on: December 03, 2005, 12:34:16 PM »
What about the question pertaining to art and subtleties that was augmented with an anology about understanding the subleties of baseball would make people more prone to appreciate baseball?

I think this must have been an experimental, or I don't remember it at all!

 :D

Rooster

  • ****
  • 496
  • This dog has a tough life.
    • View Profile
Re: POST-MORTEM December '05 - Logical Reasoning
« Reply #49 on: December 03, 2005, 12:34:26 PM »
isnt it possible taht they just got a resistance to the sleeping pills? and why does after 2 weeks suddenly not fall into "new"
can someone answer this