Law School Discussion

POST-MORTEM December '05 - Logical Reasoning

Brett McKay

  • ****
  • 225
  • The Frugal Law Student
    • View Profile
    • The Frugal Law Student
Re: POST-MORTEM December '05 - Logical Reasoning
« Reply #20 on: December 03, 2005, 12:26:44 PM »
So far
1. Ants question
2. Voting- voters who voted for the winner attached more importance to election
3.60 psychologial problems- ????
4. REM sleep- experience more stress in waking life
5. weaken the time management question- ????

Rooster

  • ****
  • 496
  • This dog has a tough life.
    • View Profile
Re: POST-MORTEM December '05 - Logical Reasoning
« Reply #21 on: December 03, 2005, 12:27:07 PM »
what was the answer to the question about the insomniacs and getting sleep with the pill and placebo?

Think this was the medication is ineffective and insomniacs sleep better initially in a new setting.

I was between that one and some other one, and i chose the other, dont remember what

Brett McKay

  • ****
  • 225
  • The Frugal Law Student
    • View Profile
    • The Frugal Law Student
Re: POST-MORTEM December '05 - Logical Reasoning
« Reply #22 on: December 03, 2005, 12:27:15 PM »
what was the answer to the question about the insomniacs and getting sleep with the pill and placebo?

I went with "everyone got better sleep in a new environment, the drugs had no effect"

same

Wolvie

  • ****
  • 173
    • View Profile
Re: POST-MORTEM December '05 - Logical Reasoning
« Reply #23 on: December 03, 2005, 12:27:41 PM »
i remember the question about REM sleep and the lack of it causing stress. The answer was that if you got little REM sleep then you would be more stressed


i put this as the answer (think it was E) too bc i thought it best strengthened it...but seems like a lot of you but the other, which was A.

Re: POST-MORTEM December '05 - Logical Reasoning
« Reply #24 on: December 03, 2005, 12:27:54 PM »
For the tax question I picked gasoline.  It costs a lot to enforce, therefore, if it doesn't raise revenue, it's ineffective.

matts720

  • ****
  • 832
  • Let's Go Nova!!!
    • AOL Instant Messenger - matts072083
    • View Profile
    • MySpace profile
    • Email
Re: POST-MORTEM December '05 - Logical Reasoning
« Reply #25 on: December 03, 2005, 12:28:06 PM »
For that 60 psychological question, I think I went with more than 50 weeks to treat as well..

Brett McKay

  • ****
  • 225
  • The Frugal Law Student
    • View Profile
    • The Frugal Law Student
Re: POST-MORTEM December '05 - Logical Reasoning
« Reply #26 on: December 03, 2005, 12:28:12 PM »
LRs I remember and had troublw with. . .

-60 psychological disorders

-weaken the managers argument in favor of time management training (or whatever)

Those are exactly the ones I had trouble with.  I put the response about some psychological disorders taking more than 50 weeks to treat (E, I think), and that efficient managers generally don't need to improve their productivity.  But I was uncertain about both.
same

Terabithia

  • ****
  • 711
  • Wondering and Wishing
    • View Profile
Re: POST-MORTEM December '05 - Logical Reasoning
« Reply #27 on: December 03, 2005, 12:28:41 PM »
me too i was between that and the pscyhological effects. I hope I went with the right one. Actually I did go with the enviornment one!! YES!!

Brett McKay

  • ****
  • 225
  • The Frugal Law Student
    • View Profile
    • The Frugal Law Student
Re: POST-MORTEM December '05 - Logical Reasoning
« Reply #28 on: December 03, 2005, 12:28:57 PM »
i remember the question about REM sleep and the lack of it causing stress. The answer was that if you got little REM sleep then you would be more stressed


i put this as the answer (think it was E) too bc i thought it best strengthened it...but seems like a lot of you but the other, which was A.

I put the same answer as you

Re: POST-MORTEM December '05 - Logical Reasoning
« Reply #29 on: December 03, 2005, 12:29:06 PM »
A was that non-REM sleep makes people irritable, or something like that, and that was the opposite of what the question was looking for, because I think it was looking for a strengthener, and A would have weakened it, because the conclusion was that specifically REM sleep is what is relevant.