Law School Discussion

.

be10dwn

Re: W at 35%
« Reply #40 on: November 04, 2005, 06:44:18 AM »
it does make for good TV though

FossilJ

  • *****
  • 11330
  • Carbon-date THIS, biznitch!
    • View Profile
    • Cricket Rules!
    • Email
Re: W at 35%
« Reply #41 on: November 04, 2005, 06:47:52 AM »
Sadly, yes.

Although I think I'm finally starting to fade here.  7 AM bedtime.  Perfect.

Luckily I have no classes tomorrow, so I can sleep in until 12:30/1.  But I have to hit the gym, and I have a meeting with a client at 4:30, so my desired 3 PM wakeup is not possible.   :-\

FossilJ

  • *****
  • 11330
  • Carbon-date THIS, biznitch!
    • View Profile
    • Cricket Rules!
    • Email
Re: W at 35%
« Reply #42 on: November 04, 2005, 06:52:09 AM »
I do get to relax, just not when I want to.  hahaha

Julie Fern

  • *****
  • 25797
  • hillary clinton say "boo!"
    • View Profile
Re: W at 35%
« Reply #43 on: November 04, 2005, 10:39:19 AM »
Was a dumb thread anyway. Would've degenerated into another Julie vs. Republicans shouting match.


your point being?

! B L U E WAR R I O R..!

  • *****
  • 7267
  • "make a friend who was once a stranger" br.war.
    • View Profile
Re: W at 35%
« Reply #44 on: November 05, 2005, 11:28:10 AM »
their will be a people's government in the middle of the kingdoms of syria and saudi arabia...and the theocracy of iran.
and the idea of having a democracy is a contagious disease.

I'm sorry.  Democracy is inherently superior to monarchy and theocracy... why?

did not write superior...just contagious.

! B L U E WAR R I O R..!

  • *****
  • 7267
  • "make a friend who was once a stranger" br.war.
    • View Profile
Re: W at 35%
« Reply #45 on: November 05, 2005, 11:38:03 AM »
and how much was bush expected to lose the election by...according to the corporate media approval ratings, that is?




Actually Bush was expected to take the election by ease, until the first debate came resulting in Bush not being able to put together a coherent answer.  And the networks split screen didn't help him either.  ;)

After that, it was a dead heat and it was anyones guess who would win.

Kerry, though, was expected to take a close Ohio, but the outcome of that state's vote is a story for another day.  >:(

aye was interested until you mentioned kerry...that is in the past, my dear and he did not beat bush...let it go.

FossilJ

  • *****
  • 11330
  • Carbon-date THIS, biznitch!
    • View Profile
    • Cricket Rules!
    • Email
Re: W at 35%
« Reply #46 on: November 05, 2005, 02:07:35 PM »
their will be a people's government in the middle of the kingdoms of syria and saudi arabia...and the theocracy of iran.
and the idea of having a democracy is a contagious disease.

I'm sorry.  Democracy is inherently superior to monarchy and theocracy... why?

did not write superior...just contagious.

You don't have to write it to imply it.

! B L U E WAR R I O R..!

  • *****
  • 7267
  • "make a friend who was once a stranger" br.war.
    • View Profile
Re: W at 35%
« Reply #47 on: November 06, 2005, 09:41:41 AM »
their will be a people's government in the middle of the kingdoms of syria and saudi arabia...and the theocracy of iran.
and the idea of having a democracy is a contagious disease.

I'm sorry.  Democracy is inherently superior to monarchy and theocracy... why?

did not write superior...just contagious.

You don't have to write it to imply it.

is this implied?

...you are so far off the track that it is not even snowing yet; you are in a rowboat the middle of the atlantic...

and you assume you are "stopping by woods on a snowy evening."

"corruptionist government" is inherently superior to a monarchy, theocracy, or democracy. ;)