Law School Discussion

republican hypocrisy at finest

verbal213

  • ****
  • 539
  • Go crazy folks, go crazy!!
    • View Profile
Re: republican hypocrisy at finest
« Reply #10 on: October 23, 2005, 06:31:01 PM »
today, on meet press:

"I certainly hope that if there is going to be an indictment that says something happened, that it is an indictment on a crime and not some perjury technicality where they couldn’t indict on the crime so they go to something just to show that their two years of investigation were not a waste of time and dollars."

you mean, like when investigation into real estate development turns into questions about president's sex life?



Julie, who said this? Just curious. Also, Clinton's impeachment was not on a "perjury technicality," it was on perjury, plain and simple.

verb

sen. hutchinson;  sorry.  and you missed point:  julie agree with you that perjury is perjury;  no such thing as "perjury technicality"--although we probably hear lot of this from republicans next week.

Well, we'll see if we hear that or not, but is it your position that Clinton did perjure himself?

verb

! B L U E WAR R I O R..!

  • *****
  • 7267
  • "make a friend who was once a stranger" br.war.
    • View Profile
Re: republican hypocrisy at finest
« Reply #11 on: October 23, 2005, 09:53:26 PM »
today, on meet press:

"I certainly hope that if there is going to be an indictment that says something happened, that it is an indictment on a crime and not some perjury technicality where they couldn’t indict on the crime so they go to something just to show that their two years of investigation were not a waste of time and dollars."

you mean, like when investigation into real estate development turns into questions about president's sex life?



a counterpoint:

julie's afternoon...october 22...2005?

{lets see...go to walmart...buy milk...flyswatter...oh yeah...julie love cookies...some cookies...and why not?...some oil for the car...

hmmm? julie forgot something...lets see...go to 7-11...get some condoms...just in case...candles...batteries for flashlight...wow? prices higher here than walmart...

hmm? lets see...oh oh...julie locked keys in his car...what a putz...how stupid...julie get on cell and call locksmith...shoot...julie not have cell on him...use pay phone...woops...no payphone...

(julie wondering where all the payphones went)}




democratic machine and republican machine are both corrupt and both hypocritical...dude? is the word "finest" really an appropriate qualifier?

guess julie not as naive as aye thought...just ordinarily naive.

does it take an independent thinker to speak softly and carry a big stick; is it generally understood that loud wind usually comes from a soft reed?
 

Julie Fern

  • *****
  • 25797
  • hillary clinton say "boo!"
    • View Profile
Re: republican hypocrisy at finest
« Reply #12 on: October 24, 2005, 07:27:48 AM »
today, on meet press:

"I certainly hope that if there is going to be an indictment that says something happened, that it is an indictment on a crime and not some perjury technicality where they couldn’t indict on the crime so they go to something just to show that their two years of investigation were not a waste of time and dollars."

you mean, like when investigation into real estate development turns into questions about president's sex life?



Julie, who said this? Just curious. Also, Clinton's impeachment was not on a "perjury technicality," it was on perjury, plain and simple.

verb

sen. hutchinson;  sorry.  and you missed point:  julie agree with you that perjury is perjury;  no such thing as "perjury technicality"--although we probably hear lot of this from republicans next week.

Well, we'll see if we hear that or not, but is it your position that Clinton did perjure himself?

verb

absolutely.  at same time, that not merit impeachment.

Julie Fern

  • *****
  • 25797
  • hillary clinton say "boo!"
    • View Profile
Re: republican hypocrisy at finest
« Reply #13 on: October 24, 2005, 07:30:30 AM »
today, on meet press:

"I certainly hope that if there is going to be an indictment that says something happened, that it is an indictment on a crime and not some perjury technicality where they couldn’t indict on the crime so they go to something just to show that their two years of investigation were not a waste of time and dollars."

you mean, like when investigation into real estate development turns into questions about president's sex life?



a counterpoint:

julie's afternoon...october 22...2005?

{lets see...go to walmart...buy milk...flyswatter...oh yeah...julie love cookies...some cookies...and why not?...some oil for the car...

hmmm? julie forgot something...lets see...go to 7-11...get some condoms...just in case...candles...batteries for flashlight...wow? prices higher here than walmart...

hmm? lets see...oh oh...julie locked keys in his car...what a putz...how stupid...julie get on cell and call locksmith...shoot...julie not have cell on him...use pay phone...woops...no payphone...

(julie wondering where all the payphones went)}




democratic machine and republican machine are both corrupt and both hypocritical...dude? is the word "finest" really an appropriate qualifier?

guess julie not as naive as aye thought...just ordinarily naive.

does it take an independent thinker to speak softly and carry a big stick; is it generally understood that loud wind usually comes from a soft reed?
 

your wind loudest of all.  julie especially love how you try to give impression that you have access to innermost chambers of power in d.c., when julie feel confident that you only have cousin whose brother-in-law once lived next to guy who worked in government building somewhere.

TrojanChispas

  • ****
  • 4667
  • , a worthy adversary
    • View Profile
Re: republican hypocrisy at finest
« Reply #14 on: October 24, 2005, 09:24:56 AM »
today, on meet press:

"I certainly hope that if there is going to be an indictment that says something happened, that it is an indictment on a crime and not some perjury technicality where they couldn’t indict on the crime so they go to something just to show that their two years of investigation were not a waste of time and dollars."

you mean, like when investigation into real estate development turns into questions about president's sex life?



a counterpoint:

julie's afternoon...october 22...2005?

{lets see...go to walmart...buy milk...flyswatter...oh yeah...julie love cookies...some cookies...and why not?...some oil for the car...

hmmm? julie forgot something...lets see...go to 7-11...get some condoms...just in case...candles...batteries for flashlight...wow? prices higher here than walmart...

hmm? lets see...oh oh...julie locked keys in his car...what a putz...how stupid...julie get on cell and call locksmith...shoot...julie not have cell on him...use pay phone...woops...no payphone...

(julie wondering where all the payphones went)}




democratic machine and republican machine are both corrupt and both hypocritical...dude? is the word "finest" really an appropriate qualifier?

guess julie not as naive as aye thought...just ordinarily naive.

does it take an independent thinker to speak softly and carry a big stick; is it generally understood that loud wind usually comes from a soft reed?
 

translation, please.

verbal213

  • ****
  • 539
  • Go crazy folks, go crazy!!
    • View Profile
Re: republican hypocrisy at finest
« Reply #15 on: October 24, 2005, 09:51:44 AM »
today, on meet press:

"I certainly hope that if there is going to be an indictment that says something happened, that it is an indictment on a crime and not some perjury technicality where they couldn’t indict on the crime so they go to something just to show that their two years of investigation were not a waste of time and dollars."

you mean, like when investigation into real estate development turns into questions about president's sex life?



Julie, who said this? Just curious. Also, Clinton's impeachment was not on a "perjury technicality," it was on perjury, plain and simple.

verb

sen. hutchinson;  sorry.  and you missed point:  julie agree with you that perjury is perjury;  no such thing as "perjury technicality"--although we probably hear lot of this from republicans next week.

Well, we'll see if we hear that or not, but is it your position that Clinton did perjure himself?

verb

absolutely.  at same time, that not merit impeachment.

Because he lied about something personal, or because you believe the president should be held to a lower standard than everyone else?

verb

TrojanChispas

  • ****
  • 4667
  • , a worthy adversary
    • View Profile
Re: republican hypocrisy at finest
« Reply #16 on: October 24, 2005, 09:53:31 AM »
today, on meet press:

"I certainly hope that if there is going to be an indictment that says something happened, that it is an indictment on a crime and not some perjury technicality where they couldn’t indict on the crime so they go to something just to show that their two years of investigation were not a waste of time and dollars."

you mean, like when investigation into real estate development turns into questions about president's sex life?



Julie, who said this? Just curious. Also, Clinton's impeachment was not on a "perjury technicality," it was on perjury, plain and simple.

verb

sen. hutchinson;  sorry.  and you missed point:  julie agree with you that perjury is perjury;  no such thing as "perjury technicality"--although we probably hear lot of this from republicans next week.

Well, we'll see if we hear that or not, but is it your position that Clinton did perjure himself?

verb

absolutely.  at same time, that not merit impeachment.

Because he lied about something personal, or because you believe the president should be held to a lower standard than everyone else?

verb
well, it certainly wasnt a matter of national security

Julie Fern

  • *****
  • 25797
  • hillary clinton say "boo!"
    • View Profile
Re: republican hypocrisy at finest
« Reply #17 on: October 24, 2005, 10:03:15 AM »
today, on meet press:

"I certainly hope that if there is going to be an indictment that says something happened, that it is an indictment on a crime and not some perjury technicality where they couldn’t indict on the crime so they go to something just to show that their two years of investigation were not a waste of time and dollars."

you mean, like when investigation into real estate development turns into questions about president's sex life?



Julie, who said this? Just curious. Also, Clinton's impeachment was not on a "perjury technicality," it was on perjury, plain and simple.

verb

sen. hutchinson; sorry. and you missed point: julie agree with you that perjury is perjury; no such thing as "perjury technicality"--although we probably hear lot of this from republicans next week.

Well, we'll see if we hear that or not, but is it your position that Clinton did perjure himself?

verb

absolutely. at same time, that not merit impeachment.

Because he lied about something personal, or because you believe the president should be held to a lower standard than everyone else?

verb

no.  but, as julie said, details always important.  context was sen. hutchinson's apologist blather.  if rove & co. indicted for lying about plame, then (1) alleged lie was directly related to underlying investigation and (2) as 3 peat point out, dealt with matter of national security.  by contrast, clinton's lying was (1) about blowjob that had nothing whatsoever to do with whitewater and (2) not about anything except blowjob.

context here not that clinton shouldn't have been punished--although impeachment was 'way over top.  (julie not even suggest that bush 0 be impeached for what now appear to have been lies to federal investigators--not to mention public.  that just disproportionate to what did.)  larger point is that hutchinson and those who think like her are hypocrites and apologists for administration whose moral failures were obvious long ago.

Re: republican hypocrisy at finest
« Reply #18 on: October 24, 2005, 02:52:18 PM »
The Whitewater investigation was indeed an attempt to lasso Clinton with something - anything - after they couldn't prove the Whitewater charges.  I think they were hoping for some drug charges.  I've heard it said that some thought Clinton enjoyed using cocaine in the White House.  There's no evidence of that, and it is pure hearsay.

I haven't followed this Rove thing too closely, but it's starting to sound interesting.  When I hear Hannity and Limbaugh defending this thing with technical details and attacks against the journalists, it makes me go, hmmmmmmmmmm.....

Julie Fern

  • *****
  • 25797
  • hillary clinton say "boo!"
    • View Profile
Re: republican hypocrisy at finest
« Reply #19 on: October 24, 2005, 03:46:17 PM »
there plenty more to come.  it looks as though prosecutor's investigation was very thorough, and that bad for white house.