Do you think that's the answer? What would make the percentage so much less than UC Davis? Is Hastings really that less well perceived? By comparison, Fordham's employment at graduation rate is better than 80%, even though its students compete with grads from NYU, Columbia, Harvard, Georgetown, and just about everywhere.
I actually go to Hastings and the 2Ls and 3Ls I know seem to be doing just great. Sure, it's anectdotal evidence but I find it encouraging.
USNWR shows that Hastings' employment rate at graduation is ridiculously low. I think it was less than 60%? That's outrageous, especially considering that Davis was something like 77%. Does anyone why the figure is so low? Is it an error?