Law School Discussion

POTUS

Re: POTUS
« Reply #230 on: February 02, 2016, 02:35:44 PM »




As was explained to you, the initial leaked reports that Clinton was being investigated were incorrect. That the FBI is conducting an investigation into the overall matter is correct, but she is not the target of an investigation; that was a retracted story. I realize that you don't have the time or energy to get these basic facts correct, even when it was explained to you over five weeks ago, but it is what it is.

And, as I explained to you before, I am not a fan of Clinton. You may find that you will be less disappointed with reality when you base your opinions on what is occurring, as opposed to what you want to believe.
 popcorn.

Believe what you want to believe as well, but admit that maybe you drank the koolaid. Admitting you are not a Clinton fan is the first step.

We probably wont be hearing from this poster again since it is now obvious that Hillary, herself is the "subject" of the FBI criminal investigation.

This poster was wrong and misguided.

I don't keep posting here because it just keeps the troll (you) alive. You have nothing to say about any legal issue, and your knowledge of the law, or politics, or of anything barely rises to the level of the average youtube commenter.

But to accept your challenge, again, my original post was correct. The story you kept citing was retracted. Moreover, the original contention was correct. Clinton is not the subject of any investigation. The investigation is into the overall matter. There was a Fox News report, citing "sources," but nothing else, and you've misconstrued that as well.

As for hearing from me, I continue to be active commenting on legal topics. You, on the other hand, continue to occasionally troll here with bad information. So I'm not going to bother posting again, other than noting that you refused my bet because you don't actually believe the BS you are peddling.

So go peddle it somewhere else, where people are gullible and you might come off as knowledgeable. Well, I don't if there is any place that the second criterion would be met, but you get the idea. Wait ... you probably don't.

Hey dum dum, you should put the koolaide down and get up to date.  You have to read more than one newspaper account of events and details to understand a particular topic.  And try to keep up with the rest of us as far as developments.

Hillary Clinton IS the subject of a criminal FBI investigation regarding mishandling and gross negligence regarding classified information.

The story has changed my puerile friend. 

Try to keep up.

Re: POTUS
« Reply #231 on: February 03, 2016, 10:04:23 AM »
Hillary Clinton IS the subject of a criminal FBI investigation regarding mishandling and gross negligence regarding classified information.

See? This is why I hate the interwebs. It makes me have to defend people that I don't even particularly like, such as Hillary Clinton.

Cinnamon: there is an FBI investigation into how classified documents were handled at the State Dept, Clinton's emails have been looked at as part of that investigation, but Clinton is NOT the subject of the investigation.

This may sound like I'm over-parsing my words, but that's how law works! If you're NOT the subject of the investigation your chances of being indicted are nil unless the focus of the investigation switches to you.

Could that happen here? Possibly, but other than Tom DeLay claiming that he has "sources" who warn of an impending indictment, there is no evidence to support the claim.

I know that you want very badly for Clinton to be the subject of the investigation and to be indicted, but wishing won't make it happen. So far, they have found no indictable offense.

Re: POTUS
« Reply #232 on: February 03, 2016, 11:53:08 AM »
Well when the interweb drives you nuts, don't respond. Certain people just want to say absurd things to get a response, because in real life nobody listens to them, but on the interweb anyone in the world can say anything they want, and it has as much weight as anyone else.

This thread is a perfect example of that.




Re: POTUS
« Reply #233 on: February 05, 2016, 04:39:15 PM »
My friends who think Hillary Clinton is not the subject of an investigation---

It's ok.  The FBI is not investigating Hillary Clinton at all.  That is why 3 of her former aides are scheduled to be "interviewed"---cops call it questioning a witness. Witnesses can be very helpful and when they get lawyers---the cops know they are on the right track.

They are only going to ask harmless questions, and democrats have NOTHING to worry about, I'm sure some democrats don't even think these interviews are taking place. Right?

Tom Delay said Hillary is the subject of an investigation? Really? That is funny. Who cares.

Maybe reading a few or many periodicals periodically---instead of watching CNN and fox some who think the FBI is blindly investigating someone's email communication without any direction will eventually understand that their being naive.

It's ok, anyway Bernie is now tied with Clinton nationally and he will probably win the nomination.

I am seriously enjoying Hillary Clinton's fall from grace...

Re: POTUS
« Reply #234 on: February 05, 2016, 04:44:28 PM »
InterWEB. Really?

Lmao!!!


Re: POTUS
« Reply #235 on: February 05, 2016, 11:33:40 PM »
Hillary won the primary

now what?

Re: POTUS
« Reply #236 on: February 06, 2016, 09:00:46 AM »
Hillary won the primary

now what?

it is possible that mrs. Hillary will win the nomination, although it gets more exciting everyday as the fbi is actively investigating mrs. Hillary's server and ALL mrs. hillarys communications via her private "secret" email account.   fbi is looking into her emails for possible coverup from government oversight--as well as all mrs. Hillary's aides who were in her server system.   

at some point this investigation will bubble to the surface that Mrs. Hillary herself will be interviewed by the FBI.   like Nixon, the fbi investigation will deteriorate all confidence in the "subject" of the investigation.

the trick is that the Clintons have dirt on many politicians and it will be interesting to watch the collateral damage. 

I don't see her making it all the way to the November elections but if she does at some point the fbi will have to "publish" their findings.

I, unlike some who have commented on this thread am not na´ve that the fbi investigation should be taken seriously and that the longer this plays out--the deeper mrs. Hillary is in doo-doo

Re: POTUS
« Reply #237 on: February 06, 2016, 05:43:13 PM »
She already won, just accept it and move on.

Sanders ALWAYS was a joke, handpicked to grab media attention away from any real viable party contenders and yet been too coo coo for coco puffs to get the votes needed to himself beat her

Its all been a rigged show, and the sad part is you can tell man has no clue about it either (really really sad)

Re: POTUS
« Reply #238 on: February 07, 2016, 10:29:59 AM »
...or perhaps some of us have actual experience with federal investigations and understand the process beyond wishful thinking.

Re: POTUS
« Reply #239 on: February 07, 2016, 02:22:10 PM »
...or perhaps some of us have actual experience with federal investigations and understand the process beyond wishful thinking.

at me or the other guy??