The circular logic through me. Congrats on having no debt and no job. You're a winner. .
Meh, use an obvious and simple equation to answer a problem that's so vague and pessimistic it comes off as sarcasm because it is circular in reasoning? It wouldn't be without using the "congrats" followed by condemning prospects of no job, btw.Congrats, you are going to prison for 20 years and have no debt. You're a winner. Congrats, your leg fell off and you have no debt. You're a winner.Etc.
Hmmm based on the %10 of your long post I bothered to read: You seem to be missing the point- Both of the OP and myself. Post all of the stats you want- none can be relevant unless they address data on YOUR rhetoric. I've never advocated s/he should go to CUNY. Our little banter started when you said your sarcasm wasn't sarcasm. When you said circular reasoning (used as rhetoric) wasn't circular. Btw, all that can be fine- I'm not a CUNY fan, I know hardly anything about them. CUNY has nothing to do with it. The OP's top choice is CUNY. That decision seems made. S/he never asked you if they should go to CUNY. Why are you trying so hard to discourage? The question is unrelated. CUNY is probably the best choice for the OP because of the low debt. Am I saying you're right? Partly. I would loosen the noose a little because CUNY is the best choice for some people and successful attorneys do come out of CUNY. The ridiculous examples I used weren't enough. Wow- Congrats. We're arguing pointlessly and off topic. We have no debt. We're winners.
1) He never stated he scratched out CUNY. . .