No, he assumed the guy could easily burn out. Do you know what "could" means??? Here's a hint. It doesn't mean "far more likely than not." This bit-o-knowledge may come in handy next month.
You obviously did not read my post and basically rehashed what I mentioned. How does it feel to be redundant? You obviously failed to get the point also when attempting to insult me in your controverted post. I said the exact same thing. Next time, do read over my post more carefully and get the point that was made within it. I do not know how it feels to be shown up by a guy 11 years younger than you, but you should opt to take the high road. I do not feel like having to keep tutoring you like I did obst in his posts of ignorance. Now, when I say "ignorant," I merely mean not too well informed. In any case, instead of restating what I have already, you should go back and re-read my post, this time, more carefully.
I do not like insulting people so I refrain from it.
Lmfao, you Cooley students are just delusional.
At least I had parents who weren't constantly on drugs...
You end up like obst and bigs from watch TV. Culturally and intellectually remedial.
Lol, you are stupid.
you are obviously angst ridden that it would be a double-edged-sword to try and explain it to you. In other words, you wouldn't understand psychology.
You obviously have mother issues.
You can't read nor comprehend obviously.
You had to go to the military because you obviously didn't cut it for a scholarship, then go to a community college for law because you, again, didn't cut it.
these morons don't know jackshit about Big Law.
This is the most idiotic post.
You obviously don't cut it anymore Kelley.
Lol, also taken out of sheer ignorance. So, those people protesting the enslavement of Africans weren't wrong? How about those people praising and pleading to Hitler to kill all the Jews, were they not wrong as well? Oh, oh, this is a nice one, how about those people stating the world was flat, were they not wrong as well? Lastly, are the people who say homosexuality is a crime against humanity not wrong?/argument