Law School Discussion

Nine Years of Discussion
;

Author Topic: PT-11-2-24  (Read 325 times)

hellokelly

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 45
    • View Profile
    • Email
PT-11-2-24
« on: May 22, 2010, 05:12:00 PM »
Same for this one, why E is not correct?Also, is it D out of scope? shouldn't we negate the solution in the assumption question??
thx

hellokelly

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 45
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: PT-11-2-24
« Reply #1 on: May 25, 2010, 12:00:57 AM »
no one knows?? :-[ :-[

KaplanLSATInstructor

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 86
    • View Profile
Re: PT-11-2-24
« Reply #2 on: May 25, 2010, 09:18:44 AM »
(E) is not correct because appointing Lee head of the arts commission doesn't have to be the ONLY way to repay him. Even if there were other ways to repay Lee, the mayor could still want to do it by appointing him head of the arts commission.

(D) is, oddly enough, irrelevant. After all, the argument is about the mayor appointing Lee based on previous favors. Even if Lee's qualifications WERE relevant to the decision, it has no bearing on this argument.

HTH

- Chris

hellokelly

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 45
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: PT-11-2-24
« Reply #3 on: May 26, 2010, 11:51:24 PM »
I think it could be very hard to eliminate the irrelevant answers.