Law School Discussion

Nine Years of Discussion
;

Author Topic: December 2009 Curve  (Read 3063 times)

Julie Fern

  • LSD Obsessed
  • *****
  • Posts: 27208
  • tea baggers, unite! screw u.s.a.!
    • View Profile
Re: December 2009 Curve is Suspicious
« Reply #10 on: February 11, 2010, 09:54:23 AM »
julie tell you what suspicious:  weenies come 10 in pack but buns come 8 to pack.

coincidence?  julie not think so.

cooleylawstudent

  • Guest
Re: December 2009 Curve is Suspicious
« Reply #11 on: February 12, 2010, 12:07:36 AM »
Mabey, one things for sure if Star had've had you on his team Clinton would've out of office a few years sooner :o. Gotta love a good consipiracy. (even though they are somtimes true)  :-\


You keep saying suspicious. Do you mean to imply that someone did it on purpose to somehow gain something from it? If so who, what and why?

Yes, that is exactly what I am implying.  I don't think anyone who is knowledgeable about the LSAT can honestly say that PT 59 deserved such a generous curve.  There is just no way.

Who and Why?  Someone from LSAC.  I don't know why.  Someone from LSAC has an agenda, that much is certain.  LSAC regularly reads this board and other forums.  I don't know who in the LSAC is responsible, but LSAC should look into why the December curve was so generous. [edited]

Again, looking at the difficulty of the test and historical tests with generous curves, there is no way that PT 59 should have received a -14 curve.  Historically, the only tests with similarly generous curves as PT 59 have contained games of very unusual difficulty.  There was no such game(s) on PT 59 and the rest of the sections were of average difficulty.



Jessica Rabbit

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 12
  • I'm not bad, I'm just drawn that way.
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: December 2009 Curve is Suspicious
« Reply #12 on: February 12, 2010, 09:41:15 PM »
julie tell you what suspicious:  weenies come 10 in pack but buns come 8 to pack.

coincidence?  julie not think so.

hmmm.  what to do with the other two weenies...

Mitchell

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 155
    • View Profile
Re: December 2009 Curve is Suspicious
« Reply #13 on: February 13, 2010, 12:37:19 PM »
Mmmmmmmitchell

Sheshe

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 83
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: December 2009 Curve is Suspicious
« Reply #14 on: February 14, 2010, 12:06:05 AM »
OFF WITH THEIR HEADS  >:(
A democracy is nothing more than mob rule, where fifty-one percent of the people may take away the rights of the other forty-nine.

~Thomas Jefferson~

H.H.

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 12
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: December 2009 Curve
« Reply #15 on: February 14, 2010, 01:45:45 PM »
Just when I thought this thread couldn't get any funnier.  Thank you, Mitchell.

llsatt1

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 77
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: December 2009 Curve
« Reply #16 on: February 15, 2010, 08:59:36 AM »
Just when I thought this thread couldn't get any funnier.  Thank you, Mitchell.

You have a great sense of humor if you think this is funny.  Either you are too pure of heart to think that someone at LSAC wouldn't be capable of doing this, or you are plain unaware of the LSAT and previous test curves.  Depending on what I observe over the next few LSAT administrations, I'll determine whether I will let this huge mistake go or not.

Julie Fern

  • LSD Obsessed
  • *****
  • Posts: 27208
  • tea baggers, unite! screw u.s.a.!
    • View Profile
Re: December 2009 Curve
« Reply #17 on: February 15, 2010, 05:55:32 PM »
julie tell you what suspicious: weenies come 10 in pack but buns come 8 to pack.

coincidence? julie not think so.


hmmm. what to do with the other two weenies...

julie say let them give speeches at teabagger conventions.

Julie Fern

  • LSD Obsessed
  • *****
  • Posts: 27208
  • tea baggers, unite! screw u.s.a.!
    • View Profile
Re: December 2009 Curve
« Reply #18 on: February 15, 2010, 05:56:36 PM »
Just when I thought this thread couldn't get any funnier. Thank you, Mitchell.

You have a great sense of humor if you think this is funny. Either you are naive that someone at LSAC wouldn't be capable of doing this, or you are plain ignorant of the LSAT and previous test curves. Depending on what I observe over the next few LSAT administrations, I'll determine whether I will let this huge mistake go or not.

alert media.