I know I'm not prepared for the sept test. So, I'll be taking the dec one. A lot of people have told me that the December test is harder so that's why in part so many advisors say take the test in September. But that's not my reality. I'd rather score 160+ in December than a 135-150 in september. Prep courses, it seems to me, teach their particular strategy. One of the unsaid marketing hooks utilized in their pitch is that the course itself is study. I mean don't get me wrong if I could afford to take a class I would to supplement my practice.
A lot of people have told me that the December test is harder so that's why in part so many advisors say take the test in September.
A lot of people have told me that the December test is harder so that's why in part so many advisors say take the test in September. But that's not my reality.
I'm currently enrolled in a PS prep course. My diagnostic score on day one of the course was 136. I took the test for the second time today and I still only scored 141. I'm currently registered for the September LSAT. But if my score only increased by five points in the first three weeks of the course, is it reasonable to think I can bring it up another 15 points over the next month?Also, is it reasonable to expect my speed to improve dramatically over the next month? The time factor is killing me. I typically run out of time with about 7-8 questions remaining on each section.
Quote from: dtspika71 on August 31, 2009, 11:21:06 PMthis is exactly why these overpriced prepcourses are a joke...Kinda swatting a fly with a hammer there, ain't ya?
this is exactly why these overpriced prepcourses are a joke...