Toggle navigation
Home
Help
Login
Register
Login
Register
×
Close
Login
Remember me
Law School Discussion
Specific Groups
Minority and Non-Traditional Law Students
Clearly I'm delusional, but I thought 166 wasn't too bad?
+
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Clearly I'm delusional, but I thought 166 wasn't too bad?
3 Replies
1926 Views
legallyblind
1
Clearly I'm delusional, but I thought 166 wasn't too bad?
«
on:
August 01, 2009, 07:52:26 PM »
I'm reading all of these posts where people are debating whether or not to retake the LSAT and have 160+ scores, which I thought was pretty good. I wasn't thrilled with my score, since I had consistently tested in practice between 168-171, but I didn't think it was worth throwing in the towel or delaying my app until I could retake. Any insights? Please, save the snickering at me for even thinking this is a good idea. But any input would be appreciated...I'm starting to feel a bit sick at the thought of the adcom finding my application to be comic relief!
Logged
,.,.,.;.,.,.
1956
Re: Clearly I'm delusional, but I thought 166 wasn't too bad?
«
Reply #1 on:
August 02, 2009, 01:07:38 AM »
Yes, that's a terrible score, unless you want a full-ride at a toilet. Sorry. 170+ is fine.
Logged
Pardon Johnny Cash.
509
Re: Clearly I'm delusional, but I thought 166 wasn't too bad?
«
Reply #2 on:
August 02, 2009, 06:03:45 AM »
I've heard of people scoring under 170 and getting into Chicago
Logged
Ninja1
3041
☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆
Re: Clearly I'm delusional, but I thought 166 wasn't too bad?
«
Reply #3 on:
August 02, 2009, 05:44:11 PM »
166 sucks if you're a HYS striver and not a URM.
166 is great if you're trying to go to some random school in the T50, or get a good ride to a number of schools in the T100.
Logged
+
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Law School Discussion
Specific Groups
Minority and Non-Traditional Law Students
Clearly I'm delusional, but I thought 166 wasn't too bad?