Law School Discussion

Nine Years of Discussion
;

Author Topic: LSAT as compared to the other one I took  (Read 1423 times)

TJCCARDCO

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 342
    • View Profile
    • Email
LSAT as compared to the other one I took
« on: June 08, 2009, 11:59:39 PM »
 ;D :D

I was much more prepared, and without talking about the content on the LSAT. There was 1 game section on the LG that was completely impossible and it was impossible in that they asked questions on the guy who didn't get defined and that's all im saying without giving anything away which made things completely hectic. The other 3 games were basic and nothing special. Hoping for a 20/23 on there.

The LR sections were below average and probably some of the easier ones I've seen from PrepTest 30-38.

Had a RC experimental section, I knew as I was doing it that it was the experimental because of the question count. There was no way that they were going to allow that many RC questions on the test.

Having LG be my first section made me excited, but the one game disappointed me so.

Finished all the sections, our proctors even let us drink water and eat during the LSAT. It was great. Most relaxed atmosphere ever.

The RC with the Fractural Geometry was not as hard as most people are making it out to be, a lot of it was easily deciphered in the text and really could have been anything written there, the fractural geometry was just there to throw some people off because it was math. If you found the conclusions, you were fine.

Other than that, I'm just hoping the curve is fair, because it was not that hard of a test.

jimmyd11011

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 1
    • View Profile
Re: LSAT as compared to the other one I took
« Reply #1 on: June 09, 2009, 02:22:24 AM »
You got lucky though...the real RC had 27 questions too.

It was 25(LR)+26(LR)+23(Games)+27(RC) = 101 total

seclit1

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 32
    • View Profile
Re: LSAT as compared to the other one I took
« Reply #2 on: June 10, 2009, 07:12:54 PM »
You got lucky though...the real RC had 27 questions too.

It was 25(LR)+26(LR)+23(Games)+27(RC) = 101 total

how do u know it wasn't a 100 question test?

jimmyd11011

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 1
    • View Profile
Re: LSAT as compared to the other one I took
« Reply #3 on: June 10, 2009, 10:30:49 PM »
You got lucky though...the real RC had 27 questions too.

It was 25(LR)+26(LR)+23(Games)+27(RC) = 101 total

how do u know it wasn't a 100 question test?


My experimental RC and real RC both had 27 questions.

seclit1

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 32
    • View Profile
Re: LSAT as compared to the other one I took
« Reply #4 on: June 11, 2009, 05:20:58 PM »
You got lucky though...the real RC had 27 questions too.

It was 25(LR)+26(LR)+23(Games)+27(RC) = 101 total

how do u know it wasn't a 100 question test?


My experimental RC and real RC both had 27 questions.

ha, i knew it...

Fizz1

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 15
    • View Profile
Re: LSAT as compared to the other one I took
« Reply #5 on: June 12, 2009, 03:11:56 PM »
This is the order that I got my questions and the exact number of questions...

LG-22, LR-25, RC-27, RC-27, LR-26

It comes up to 100.
A-

seclit1

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 32
    • View Profile
Re: LSAT as compared to the other one I took
« Reply #6 on: June 12, 2009, 03:24:16 PM »
This is the order that I got my questions and the exact number of questions...

LG-22, LR-25, RC-27, RC-27, LR-26

It comes up to 100.

i think you have mistaken

the LG section had 23 questions...

Fizz1

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 15
    • View Profile
Re: LSAT as compared to the other one I took
« Reply #7 on: June 12, 2009, 03:27:17 PM »
Im starting to believe it. Seems like I am the only one that saw 22.  I wonder why that number is in my head?? 

Thanks tho.
A-