I'll admit, I did seem to come out of nowhere. I came into the thread after noticing it appear so often at the top of the unreads, read a few pages of the conversation, and recognized you for what you are: a horrible gimmick, trolling for attention. So, I decided to have a bit of fun with you. It started as a discussion between Matthies and myself on how much of a train wreck the thread was, and we briefly talked about puppying/kitten bombing it.But you must have me confused with someone else. Not once did I attack or insult you. I only told you that you know nothing about me, and that you were wrong when you made insulting comments. Remember that conversation? I can assure you that no insults came from me, but I can say that there were more than a few from you. Maybe if you can figure out how to use the quote function, you'd be able to track a bit better. I'll give you a hint: it's the button to the right, no further action is necessary.You must be referring to someone else when you say:Quote from: ISUCKATTHIS on July 06, 2009, 09:50:51 PMWhen I looked at your posting history, I found that you had been posting in a tread with Miss P. She had posted a link to the Drake thread while making disparaging remarks about me and a couple of other posters. You replied to that post and, immediately afterward, started engaging me in the Drake thread. Several other posters did the same, but none brought to the table the level of wild-eyed viciousness and questionable grammar that appear to be your trademark.As I said before, MissP and I rarely travel in the same circles. Note that the "feeling you" thread you refer to above is SFLSD. The one I go to every few weeks, as opposed to Exile, the one I post in daily. I didn't reply to any post about the thread, nor did I follow any link she posted in there. You can also see that I have no trouble with grammar, so poor grammar can hardly be called a trademark. Besides, as you're so ready to point out, I delete my posts. So, how much of a post history could there have been to establish any kind of a "trademark" on my posting style? Are you sure you're not thinking of someone else? I'm willing to give you the benefit of the doubt, if you're willing to concede the possibility that I'm only one of several people whose backposts you checked, and have made an honest mistake. But I won't tolerate these lies forever.And you keep making a big deal about me deleting my posts. Honestly, it's a bit egotistical to think it has anything to do with you. It doesn't matter who the post is directed toward or what it contains. All of my posts get deleted. The only exception at this point are the ones I've made recently enough that people haven't had a chance to read them, and nominations for new moderators, which I've been asked to keep. But once the new mods are announced, they're gone. Why? Because, again, I delete all of my posts, no matter what.Quote from: ISUCKATTHIS on July 06, 2009, 09:50:51 PMI'm not telling you anything about your posting history you don't already know, as you insinuate. It's just that you're lying about it and I'm not.You are telling me things about my posting history that I don't know, for the simple fact that I haven't done the things you say I have. And as far as lying about it, I think both our track records can speak volumes for the veracity of our statements. I'll stack my credibility up against yours any day of the week and twice on Sunday, coming out ahead every single time.Again, get your facts straight. I'm not putting up with any further attacks on my character.
When I looked at your posting history, I found that you had been posting in a tread with Miss P. She had posted a link to the Drake thread while making disparaging remarks about me and a couple of other posters. You replied to that post and, immediately afterward, started engaging me in the Drake thread. Several other posters did the same, but none brought to the table the level of wild-eyed viciousness and questionable grammar that appear to be your trademark.
I'm not telling you anything about your posting history you don't already know, as you insinuate. It's just that you're lying about it and I'm not.
I have to defend my signature now? Seriously? That's the best you can come up with?Because you two don't understand it, I'll defend it. The first line in my signature was created by another poster and I as a joke after a fairly heated discussion I had where someone completely misunderstood a comment I made to be an insult toward his family.And anyone familiar with IamAnXMan will know right away that the quote from him that I have in my signature contains the most hilariously ironic words ever strung together in the English language. That's why I keep them. It used to be all the rage to have a quote of IamAnXMan's misguided comments in one's signature. As far as I can tell, I'm the only one who still does.Now, I'm not tolerating this any further. Come up with some actual, real proof of any wrongdoing on my part, or stop making accusations toward me. Any further post leveling accusations toward me without evidence will be reported. It is up to you to prove that I've done something wrong, which you have failed to do at every turn, and not for me to prove that I didn't. I have corroboration that the situation is exactly as I described it earlier. All that has been directed toward me is speculation.eta: Oh, and I went back to the Drake thread to see if any part of our first encounter still exists. And it looks like your posts are gone, too. Interesting.
That's cool how you referenced a case.
I'm so far from the end of my tether right now that I reckon I could knit myself some socks with the slack.
This *&^% is completely hilarious. It's a website, folks. Honestly I hope Sands occasionally has a couple of drinks and maybe loosens his tie up and bans a couple of people just for the hell of it.
This is the most way too serious thread in the history of LSD.
I like jelly.