Law School Discussion

Nine Years of Discussion
;

Author Topic: In Defense of Briefing  (Read 2133 times)

jesus, pronounced hispanicy

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 9
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: In Defense of Briefing
« Reply #10 on: June 04, 2009, 01:05:19 AM »
I've done well in classes I've briefed thoroughly, and done not-so-well in classes I've briefed thoroughly.  I've done well in classes that I obsessively look up the citations mentioned in the notes, and not-so-well in such classes.  (I'm having sentence structure problems, sorry.) And so forth.  I have one of my best grades in a class where I learned the class in three nights--commercially--and for all intents and purposes never opened the casebook.

Law school exams aren't luck, but they're also not dependent on some process.  You can learn the same *&^% a dozen different ways.  Do whichever you hate least.  I guess that's probably what Wally's getting at, so, yeah Walls, alright.

,.,.,.;.,.,.

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 2016
    • View Profile
Re: In Defense of Briefing
« Reply #11 on: June 04, 2009, 12:00:40 PM »
I can agree with that.

The trick is to find what you hate least, and do that.

Also, long outlines = universally useless, unless you're a Ctrl + F nut like I was with PIL yesterday.

JeNeSaisLaw

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 1945
    • View Profile
Re: In Defense of Briefing
« Reply #12 on: June 05, 2009, 05:09:20 PM »
Also, long outlines = universally useless, unless you're a Ctrl + F nut like I was with PIL yesterday.

Funny to say "universally useless" following "I can agree with that."
LSN
Vanderbilt Class of 2011

,.,.,.;.,.,.

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 2016
    • View Profile
Re: In Defense of Briefing
« Reply #13 on: June 07, 2009, 12:56:21 AM »
Internal contradictions keep life interesting.

UnbiasedObserver

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 2014
    • View Profile
Re: In Defense of Briefing
« Reply #14 on: June 08, 2009, 09:56:16 PM »
Nice post, Wally.