Law School Discussion

Nine Years of Discussion
;

Author Topic: scotus nominee clearly unqualified  (Read 4586 times)

betasteve

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 21
    • View Profile
Re: scotus nominee clearly unqualified
« Reply #20 on: June 04, 2009, 10:57:38 AM »
mmmmhhhmmmm  whole thread of Julie talk make lap warm. 

but grammar mistake you had in 4th post.  It sound to correct. you edit it now, please for keep the fantasy alive. 

Also, anyone notice how Sonia like drop and add her accent when she say her last name.  It says, I am english, BUT I AM HISPANIC!  Also it make sound like boxing ring introduction. 

It too bad sonia be activist judge, and rule on emotion not law..  It make beta sad.  Luck for me, warm lap feeling will come again when Julie respond. 

Julie Fern

  • LSD Obsessed
  • *****
  • Posts: 27222
  • hillary clinton say "boo!"
    • View Profile
Re: scotus nominee clearly unqualified
« Reply #21 on: June 04, 2009, 11:08:41 AM »
that warm feeing coffee you spilled.

and sometimes julie's brain cloud lift, just for moment.  perhaps there hope even for you, although either way you going need clean pants.

betasteve

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 21
    • View Profile
Re: scotus nominee clearly unqualified
« Reply #22 on: June 04, 2009, 11:17:49 AM »
that warm feeing coffee you spilled.

and sometimes julie's brain cloud lift, just for moment.  perhaps there hope even for you, although either way you going need clean pants.
You right about that! 

It really too bad Sotomayor doesn't understand 2nd amendment and think that cause best give undesireable result, must mean test is discriminatory, though.  THink her logic broken.  Ah, women...  almost always the case.

! B L U E WAR R I O R..!

  • LSD Obsessed
  • *****
  • Posts: 8173
  • "make a friend who was once a stranger" br.war.
    • View Profile
Re: scotus nominee clearly unqualified
« Reply #23 on: June 08, 2009, 08:51:35 PM »
you broken record.

better find democratic sugar-daddy.


u just upset cause aye right and hiliary not choice...and u upset cause beta mock u... ;)


bush and 'bam appointee gonna get selected to scotus...
If you prick us, do we not bleed?  
  if you tickle us, do we not laugh? if you poison  
  us, do we not die? and if you wrong us, shall we not  
  revenge? m.of v. w.shaka                                             speare

Julie Fern

  • LSD Obsessed
  • *****
  • Posts: 27222
  • hillary clinton say "boo!"
    • View Profile
Re: scotus nominee clearly unqualified
« Reply #24 on: June 09, 2009, 08:11:51 AM »
that warm feeing coffee you spilled.

and sometimes julie's brain cloud lift, just for moment. perhaps there hope even for you, although either way you going need clean pants.
You right about that!

It really too bad Sotomayor doesn't understand 2nd amendment and think that cause best give undesireable result, must mean test is discriminatory, though. THink her logic broken. Ah, women... almost always the case.

nonsense.  she just following precedent.  you got problem that?

easterbrook--reagan appointee--just wrote similar opinion nra v. chicago holding no incorporation.  nra has applied cert.  that how it supposed work.  after all, four stooges can bring issue before scotus.

Julie Fern

  • LSD Obsessed
  • *****
  • Posts: 27222
  • hillary clinton say "boo!"
    • View Profile
Re: scotus nominee clearly unqualified
« Reply #25 on: June 09, 2009, 08:15:35 AM »
you broken record.

better find democratic sugar-daddy.


u just upset cause aye right and hiliary not choice...and u upset cause beta mock u... ;)


bush and 'bam appointee gonna get selected to scotus...

why would obama want appoint hrc, and why would she want appointment?  aside already having job arguably more important, hrc never indicate interest scotus appointment.

but julie enjoy how you still trying make "career" out clintons.

betasteve

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 21
    • View Profile
Re: scotus nominee clearly unqualified
« Reply #26 on: June 11, 2009, 06:14:03 PM »
that warm feeing coffee you spilled.

and sometimes julie's brain cloud lift, just for moment. perhaps there hope even for you, although either way you going need clean pants.
You right about that!

It really too bad Sotomayor doesn't understand 2nd amendment and think that cause best give undesireable result, must mean test is discriminatory, though. THink her logic broken. Ah, women... almost always the case.

nonsense.  she just following precedent.  you got problem that?

easterbrook--reagan appointee--just wrote similar opinion nra v. chicago holding no incorporation.  nra has applied cert.  that how it supposed work.  after all, four stooges can bring issue before scotus.
That no Ricci case, though..  Ricci stupid.  Sotomayor stupid, woman.  She even break her own foot walking.  Durrr

Julie Fern

  • LSD Obsessed
  • *****
  • Posts: 27222
  • hillary clinton say "boo!"
    • View Profile
Re: scotus nominee clearly unqualified
« Reply #27 on: June 12, 2009, 05:15:10 PM »
whose foot you prefer she break?

betasteve

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 21
    • View Profile
Re: scotus nominee clearly unqualified
« Reply #28 on: June 12, 2009, 10:03:01 PM »
whose foot you prefer she break?
Wait?  You correct usage?  My word spinning now.

Julie Fern

  • LSD Obsessed
  • *****
  • Posts: 27222
  • hillary clinton say "boo!"
    • View Profile
Re: scotus nominee clearly unqualified
« Reply #29 on: June 13, 2009, 03:05:29 PM »
brain cloud lift occasionally, but this not one those times.