Quote from: TeresaPinfold on April 21, 2009, 01:58:36 PMActually I think the problem is that most of the ranking is not based on real, meaningful factors like LSAT. A ranking based purely on a LSAT/GPA index would probably be more accurate, but it wouldn't be worthy of a lucrative magazine edition.Good point, but I disagree.USN&WR isn't simply listing the "most selective law schools" (and even in that case, merely factoring LSAT/GPA is insufficient). It is listing the 'best' schools. Your academic experience will be enhanced when you have a library with plenty of resources and space, when your professors are of high quality, when the school spends money on enhancing your experience, when the school provides the ability to summer in a good firm that will give interesting work (employment %), and when other students are very smart. All of these factors are relevant in assessing the quality of the legal education.That said, I don't think USN&WR is perfect. I think it could add some measurements, use different proportions to come up with rank, and measure things differently.
Actually I think the problem is that most of the ranking is not based on real, meaningful factors like LSAT. A ranking based purely on a LSAT/GPA index would probably be more accurate, but it wouldn't be worthy of a lucrative magazine edition.
Quote from: Number81 on April 21, 2009, 10:37:01 PMQuote from: TeresaPinfold on April 21, 2009, 01:58:36 PMActually I think the problem is that most of the ranking is not based on real, meaningful factors like LSAT. A ranking based purely on a LSAT/GPA index would probably be more accurate, but it wouldn't be worthy of a lucrative magazine edition.Good point, but I disagree.USN&WR isn't simply listing the "most selective law schools" (and even in that case, merely factoring LSAT/GPA is insufficient). It is listing the 'best' schools. Your academic experience will be enhanced when you have a library with plenty of resources and space, when your professors are of high quality, when the school spends money on enhancing your experience, when the school provides the ability to summer in a good firm that will give interesting work (employment %), and when other students are very smart. All of these factors are relevant in assessing the quality of the legal education.That said, I don't think USN&WR is perfect. I think it could add some measurements, use different proportions to come up with rank, and measure things differently.I’d go for gladiator style combat between each schools “hero” the self appointed gunner champion in a fight to the death using flails and tridents. The longer you schools gladiator lasts, the higher the ranking, until out of the two reaming battlers, one must choose between letting the defeated live and get the accolades those with a heart in legal academe, or instead go for his own glory and slit his or hers throat and become EIC of the Law Review. Payperview of course, with Nancy Grace doing the announcing, and adoring fans from each school watching with anticipation to see if their classmate remains alive long engough to get the school a respectable rank, but die himself so you don’t have to complete with him for grades or jobs next semester. It appeals to all law students on so many different levels.
Well he's had it in for me ever since I kinda ran over his dog... Well, replace the word "kinda" with "repeatedly" and the word "dog" with "son."
Aren't we ignoring the real question here?When do the new Cooley rankings come out?
Quote from: Bevelicious87 on April 20, 2009, 12:24:30 PMQuote from: T. Durden on April 20, 2009, 12:22:01 PMQuote from: StevePirates on April 20, 2009, 12:00:58 PMI think that San Diego's leap was pretty impressive. I wonder if their part time program factored in there. All the more reason that this list appears suspect; USD would have expected a similar drop given the incorporation of the PT program detailsIt seems semi-bizarre to me that a program (GW, with Fordham being similarly situated) with the 13th or 14th highest median admission #ers in the nation (167, 3.75) and the 18th highest NLJ 250 placement by % and 6th by total # is being bumped to 28 by Indiana, Iowa ... William and Mary?!?! It makes sense if (and only if) USNWR factored in PT #ers but apparently this is not the case; USD jumps by how many spots? Something is wrong here. So will we find out in two days that TLS pwned us all? lolhah .. I admit that it seems unlikely. I think that the more likely scenario is that USNWR has officially jumped the shark
Quote from: T. Durden on April 20, 2009, 12:22:01 PMQuote from: StevePirates on April 20, 2009, 12:00:58 PMI think that San Diego's leap was pretty impressive. I wonder if their part time program factored in there. All the more reason that this list appears suspect; USD would have expected a similar drop given the incorporation of the PT program detailsIt seems semi-bizarre to me that a program (GW, with Fordham being similarly situated) with the 13th or 14th highest median admission #ers in the nation (167, 3.75) and the 18th highest NLJ 250 placement by % and 6th by total # is being bumped to 28 by Indiana, Iowa ... William and Mary?!?! It makes sense if (and only if) USNWR factored in PT #ers but apparently this is not the case; USD jumps by how many spots? Something is wrong here. So will we find out in two days that TLS pwned us all? lol
Quote from: StevePirates on April 20, 2009, 12:00:58 PMI think that San Diego's leap was pretty impressive. I wonder if their part time program factored in there. All the more reason that this list appears suspect; USD would have expected a similar drop given the incorporation of the PT program detailsIt seems semi-bizarre to me that a program (GW, with Fordham being similarly situated) with the 13th or 14th highest median admission #ers in the nation (167, 3.75) and the 18th highest NLJ 250 placement by % and 6th by total # is being bumped to 28 by Indiana, Iowa ... William and Mary?!?! It makes sense if (and only if) USNWR factored in PT #ers but apparently this is not the case; USD jumps by how many spots? Something is wrong here.
I think that San Diego's leap was pretty impressive. I wonder if their part time program factored in there.
Quote from: T. Durden on April 20, 2009, 12:27:22 PMQuote from: Bevelicious87 on April 20, 2009, 12:24:30 PMQuote from: T. Durden on April 20, 2009, 12:22:01 PMQuote from: StevePirates on April 20, 2009, 12:00:58 PMI think that San Diego's leap was pretty impressive. I wonder if their part time program factored in there. All the more reason that this list appears suspect; USD would have expected a similar drop given the incorporation of the PT program detailsIt seems semi-bizarre to me that a program (GW, with Fordham being similarly situated) with the 13th or 14th highest median admission #ers in the nation (167, 3.75) and the 18th highest NLJ 250 placement by % and 6th by total # is being bumped to 28 by Indiana, Iowa ... William and Mary?!?! It makes sense if (and only if) USNWR factored in PT #ers but apparently this is not the case; USD jumps by how many spots? Something is wrong here. So will we find out in two days that TLS pwned us all? lolhah .. I admit that it seems unlikely. I think that the more likely scenario is that USNWR has officially jumped the shark It's official lol