Quote from: Ninja1 on April 28, 2009, 08:04:26 PMQuote from: LS_Elisabeth on April 28, 2009, 01:02:54 PMMy purchasing decision? I'm actually going to Thomas Jefferson on a scholarship.Ninja, these posts ARE childish and out of pure insecurity. Anyone in law school should be able to figure that out.But oh well, that's your problem. I feel sorry for you.Plus, stop acting like FSU is of Harvard caliber. You're not that "better" than the rest of us.Still, you make your JD bed and get to lay in it, even if it costs you less. Scholarships won't save you from shitlaw.I, unlike you, am in law school, so save the "anyone in law school" lines for another few months, you ain't there yet.Any amount of insecurity and childishness you're "detecting" is simply coming from the projection of your own decisions about where to attend school. Don't feel sorry for me, I go to one of the three best schools in Florida while you'll be going to the third best school (and a stand alone school at that) in San Diego. If anyone needs some sympathy, it's not me.I never said FSU was of Harvard caliber (our athletics are clearly superior ), but compared to TJ, it might as well be Harvard. And it's "You're not that much "better" than the rest of us" or "You're not that "better" than the rest of us". Word choice and grammar are important in the legal field, you might learn that at TJ, but probably not. HTHI have to agree with Elisabeth: you are being childish.
Quote from: LS_Elisabeth on April 28, 2009, 01:02:54 PMMy purchasing decision? I'm actually going to Thomas Jefferson on a scholarship.Ninja, these posts ARE childish and out of pure insecurity. Anyone in law school should be able to figure that out.But oh well, that's your problem. I feel sorry for you.Plus, stop acting like FSU is of Harvard caliber. You're not that "better" than the rest of us.Still, you make your JD bed and get to lay in it, even if it costs you less. Scholarships won't save you from shitlaw.I, unlike you, am in law school, so save the "anyone in law school" lines for another few months, you ain't there yet.Any amount of insecurity and childishness you're "detecting" is simply coming from the projection of your own decisions about where to attend school. Don't feel sorry for me, I go to one of the three best schools in Florida while you'll be going to the third best school (and a stand alone school at that) in San Diego. If anyone needs some sympathy, it's not me.I never said FSU was of Harvard caliber (our athletics are clearly superior ), but compared to TJ, it might as well be Harvard. And it's "You're not that much "better" than the rest of us" or "You're not that "better" than the rest of us". Word choice and grammar are important in the legal field, you might learn that at TJ, but probably not. HTH
My purchasing decision? I'm actually going to Thomas Jefferson on a scholarship.Ninja, these posts ARE childish and out of pure insecurity. Anyone in law school should be able to figure that out.But oh well, that's your problem. I feel sorry for you.Plus, stop acting like FSU is of Harvard caliber. You're not that "better" than the rest of us.
Okay Ninja, our conversation is done. You win. I hope you feel superior to me. After all, you know everything about TJ, especially considering you live across the country and probably don't know anyone from San Diego. Anyways, anyone else attending TJ this fall?
Don't hate the player, hate the game.And I suppose if by "realistic" you mean "childish", then yes, I'll agree.
Oh yea...you're delicious and lean, but unsustainable and not to be consumed daily.
Quote from: Ninja1 on April 29, 2009, 01:13:08 AMDon't hate the player, hate the game.And I suppose if by "realistic" you mean "childish", then yes, I'll agree."Player." And I think you mean "if by 'childish' you mean 'realistic,' then yes, I'll agree."For the record, that's not what I meant. One can be realistic without being childish.
Quote from: bl825 on April 29, 2009, 07:22:34 AMQuote from: Ninja1 on April 29, 2009, 01:13:08 AMDon't hate the player, hate the game.And I suppose if by "realistic" you mean "childish", then yes, I'll agree."Player." And I think you mean "if by 'childish' you mean 'realistic,' then yes, I'll agree."For the record, that's not what I meant. One can be realistic without being childish.I'd say I'm more "condescending feminine hygiene product" than anything else really.
Quote from: Ninja1 on April 29, 2009, 02:11:03 PMQuote from: bl825 on April 29, 2009, 07:22:34 AMQuote from: Ninja1 on April 29, 2009, 01:13:08 AMDon't hate the player, hate the game.And I suppose if by "realistic" you mean "childish", then yes, I'll agree."Player." And I think you mean "if by 'childish' you mean 'realistic,' then yes, I'll agree."For the record, that's not what I meant. One can be realistic without being childish.I'd say I'm more "condescending feminine hygiene product" than anything else really.I think we've reached an understanding. Carry on.
Quote from: bl825 on April 29, 2009, 02:14:32 PMQuote from: Ninja1 on April 29, 2009, 02:11:03 PMQuote from: bl825 on April 29, 2009, 07:22:34 AMQuote from: Ninja1 on April 29, 2009, 01:13:08 AMDon't hate the player, hate the game.And I suppose if by "realistic" you mean "childish", then yes, I'll agree."Player." And I think you mean "if by 'childish' you mean 'realistic,' then yes, I'll agree."For the record, that's not what I meant. One can be realistic without being childish.I'd say I'm more "condescending feminine hygiene product" than anything else really.I think we've reached an understanding. Carry on.I do like how we can usually talk things out to a rational conclusion. You're easily my favorite poster that I disagree with on a semi-regular basis.