PT34: sec 2:
#11 – The answer is (C) because the stimulus initially talks about “in theory” while it concludes like it is a fact? Therefore the confusion?
PT34: sec 3:
#21 – Is the answer (C) because this would be best to support the change by showing a stable variable (the same food items)? I’m confused.
#25 – What is the main pattern in this stimulus?
PT35: sec 1:
#13 – (D) is the answer because by subjects confirming that the beliefs are true undermines the last sentence of the stimulus?
#23 – (A) is the answer because the stimulus bases everything on the “survival”? Help!
PT35: sec 4:
#12 – Is the answer (C) in this case because this choice shows that mothers who did not eat that diet have no problems, therefore showing having one problem is OK when eating the nutritious diet doctors recommend?
PT36: sec 1:
#12 – I didn’t know making a shift could be a vulnerability? I noticed it while solving the problem that the argument goes from retail prices to costs but this can be a weakness?
PT36: sec 3:
#19 – What is the pattern in the stimulus? It seems to me, overgeneralization because father doesn’t like something everyone should be same.
PT37: sec 2:
#22 – (B) is the answer because the stimulus is basically saying some think the punishment for crimes should be mitigated but in the end it shouldn’t because it would be based on motives and is a matter of conjecture – so should not mitigate? So (B) stating harsh punishment is better than overly lenient one fits? If I’m wrong what’s the logic?
#23 – Roxanne is saying people shouldn’t buy new ivory and buy antique ivory because it won’t affect the poaching (because they don’t need to fulfill the demand). Salvador is saying because demand for antiques are higher than supply, they are buying new ivory instead. He also says people shouldn’t buy ivory at all – leading to drop in demand. So to do this question, I have to pick a choice that these two individuals will disagree on (one agree/one disagree). So, (B) doesn’t seem like a real good choice but is this the reason why that is the answer? – Salvador will agree to this statement because he is saying new ivory demand is high because antique demand is high, thus if antique demand is low, new ivory will lower too (?). And of course Roxanne will disagree.