Law School Discussion

Nine Years of Discussion
;
Discussion Discussion
Resources Resources
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Barbies: inherently sexist, or just a doll?  (Read 409 times)

CTL

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 3553
    • View Profile
Barbies: inherently sexist, or just a doll?
« on: March 03, 2009, 02:51:14 PM »
Now that the brand has been around for half a century, Barbie has been many things to many people.  What do you guys think about Barbie? 

I heard a discussion about her on the Diane Rehm show and now I'm curious to hear some more perspectives.
Logged
If looks could kill, you would be an uzi.

CTL

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 3553
    • View Profile
Re: Barbies: inherently sexist, or just a doll?
« Reply #1 on: March 03, 2009, 02:53:51 PM »
Quote from: In Soviet Russia on March 03, 2009, 02:53:20 PM
Definitely sexist. Barbie gets to have an idealized feminine form, but when it comes to having an idealized masculine form, Ken was robbed.

 :D
Logged
If looks could kill, you would be an uzi.
Pages: [1]