Hmmm....your arguements are not strong enough to persuade me otherwise.
Yeah, I think I'll go to DePaul, see you there. I hope we are in the same section so we can have some good classroom discussions. And I apologize in advance for pushing you out of the top 15% - kidding! I'll consider myself lucky to stay in the top 30%!My top three schools that I am debating between are Cincinnati, DePaul, and Kent. Am still hoping for some Tier 1's to take me off the bench!
Quote from: ohioan on March 02, 2009, 11:19:10 PMYeah, I think I'll go to DePaul, see you there. I hope we are in the same section so we can have some good classroom discussions. And I apologize in advance for pushing you out of the top 15% - kidding! I'll consider myself lucky to stay in the top 30%!My top three schools that I am debating between are Cincinnati, DePaul, and Kent. Am still hoping for some Tier 1's to take me off the bench!I shall look for you there, with your "Ohio" sweatshirt, talking up your PhD, and I'llthink... you, you are the one. And I shall follow you. Jamming your wifi connection, and then precariously "misplacing" the only hard copies of the critical research you need to the same shelf, just one floor above or below in the library where it should be. I will not shower for a week, and eat a healthy bowl of chili the night before exams, and sit bribe the proctor that I can sit in front of you. You shall rue the day...
Quote from: contrarian on March 02, 2009, 01:01:37 AMDepaul posts their historical class ranks and associated GPA here. 3.3 will be in about the top 30% of the class.Yikes. Ask Depaul to lower the GPA requirement to 3.0, and maybe it's worth it.You could end up in the top 1/3 of the class (certainly respectable) and still lose your scholarship. Boo.
Depaul posts their historical class ranks and associated GPA here. 3.3 will be in about the top 30% of the class.