The curve at Penn is pretty generous. 15% of 1Ls receive As, 15% get A-s, 27.5% get B+s, 27.5% get Bs, etc etc. Depends on the curve, I guess.
Let's not be rude to the n00b.OP: a grading curve works like this. In any given class, the professor will be able to give out a strict number of As, Bs, and Cs. At my school, about 15% earn As, 70% earn Bs, and a few earn Cs.Alabama wants you to keep a 3.0, which means that you will need at least a B average. However, law school curves are often much (much) lower than undergraduate curves. The professor could be required to keep the median grade at a B-, in which case it would be hard to keep your scholarship. You should inquire. Furthermore, I don't think that you should matriculate at a lower-ranked law school like Bama unless you want to be a lawyer. You could end up unemployed after graduation.
So what? The rankings are virtually meaningless after the top ten or so. Nobody actually thinks, for instance, that Iowa is more prestigious than Fordham.This forum serves the useful function of a reality check. We're not here to sugarcoat. I'm sick of all of the flowery "you'll be fine" bull that turns people into cynical, indebted people by the time graduation rolls around.
Quote from: Freely Give Leave to Amend on February 10, 2009, 01:58:54 PMSo what? The rankings are virtually meaningless after the top ten or so. Nobody actually thinks, for instance, that Iowa is more prestigious than Fordham.This forum serves the useful function of a reality check. We're not here to sugarcoat. I'm sick of all of the flowery "you'll be fine" bull that turns people into cynical, indebted people by the time graduation rolls around.this is really harsh. i think plenty of people attending schools outside of the top 10 on this board have been told of the risks plenty of times, but in this case, bama is ranked #32 and this person has a scholarship (since we don't know the conditions, it could be set for all three years or have an extremely generous grading scale; this isn't a TTT that flunks out 20% of the class after 1L year). if they want to practice in alabama, this seems like a pretty good place to go. OP, ask what the grading curve is and what the scholarship conditions are. if they're unreasonable: average is a 2.7 and scholarship requires a 3.3 or something, that's risky. if it just requires good academic standing, i.e. passing grades, or an average of 2.5 when the curve is 3.0, and you want to practice in alabama or the southeast, sounds like a good deal.
Quote from: clairel on February 11, 2009, 04:41:11 AMQuote from: Freely Give Leave to Amend on February 10, 2009, 01:58:54 PMSo what? The rankings are virtually meaningless after the top ten or so. Nobody actually thinks, for instance, that Iowa is more prestigious than Fordham.This forum serves the useful function of a reality check. We're not here to sugarcoat. I'm sick of all of the flowery "you'll be fine" bull that turns people into cynical, indebted people by the time graduation rolls around.this is really harsh. i think plenty of people attending schools outside of the top 10 on this board have been told of the risks plenty of times, but in this case, bama is ranked #32 and this person has a scholarship (since we don't know the conditions, it could be set for all three years or have an extremely generous grading scale; this isn't a TTT that flunks out 20% of the class after 1L year). if they want to practice in alabama, this seems like a pretty good place to go. OP, ask what the grading curve is and what the scholarship conditions are. if they're unreasonable: average is a 2.7 and scholarship requires a 3.3 or something, that's risky. if it just requires good academic standing, i.e. passing grades, or an average of 2.5 when the curve is 3.0, and you want to practice in alabama or the southeast, sounds like a good deal.How is sharing a school with this guy (Freely Give Leave...)?
Yea, I just can't stand flames. So many of these guys are just completely different people online, hiding behind the pseudo-anonymity of their LSD personas.
Quote from: what's your name on February 11, 2009, 08:23:09 AMYea, I just can't stand flames. So many of these guys are just completely different people online, hiding behind the pseudo-anonymity of their LSD personas.no, apparently, he really does study way more than his counterparts.