Law School Discussion

Nine Years of Discussion
;

Author Topic: =  (Read 678 times)

,.,.,.;.,.,.

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 2016
    • View Profile
=
« on: February 08, 2009, 05:23:49 PM »
=

Miss P

  • LSD Obsessed
  • *****
  • Posts: 21337
    • View Profile
Re: About to Turn in Memo Early: Taking ?s
« Reply #1 on: February 08, 2009, 06:51:43 PM »
Gladly, as long as you explain how to short form cite a Supreme Court case over an Appellate.  Let's say I cite the Supreme Court one first, then the Appellate.  Then I short form.  Would it be fine to just indicate the reporter, a la Jimmy, 435 N.E.2d at 243?

sure.

I am confused as to why you are citing the CoA decision instead of the SCOTUS decision, but perhaps I am misunderstanding what you mean by "over an."  Also, in general, you should use the official reporter, not the regional reporter. 

Congrats on finishing, Wally.

ETA: Otherwise, your short form is fine.
That's cool how you referenced a case.

Quote from: archival
I'm so far from the end of my tether right now that I reckon I could knit myself some socks with the slack.

seatochitown

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 67
    • View Profile
Re: About to Turn in Memo Early: Taking ?s
« Reply #2 on: February 08, 2009, 08:20:26 PM »
Since our memo is on state law, I'm guessing he means the Supreme Court of Illinois and an Illinois appellate court.

Miss P

  • LSD Obsessed
  • *****
  • Posts: 21337
    • View Profile
Re: About to Turn in Memo Early: Taking ?s
« Reply #3 on: February 08, 2009, 08:27:00 PM »
Since our memo is on state law, I'm guessing he means the Supreme Court of Illinois and an Illinois appellate court.

Nonetheless, I doubt the regional reporter is the official reporter.
That's cool how you referenced a case.

Quote from: archival
I'm so far from the end of my tether right now that I reckon I could knit myself some socks with the slack.