restatement statute of frauds question

[Jake_MONDATTA]

In reviewing a practice exam, I came across my prof's answer in which he says that the statute of frauds no longer applies when one party fully performs.  Does anybody know where this exception is to be found in the restatement?  I could only find R 2d 145 which nixes the SOF when there is full performance by "all" parties.

[Jake_MONDATTA]

Follow-up:  please note that I'm not talking about enforcing the contract under detrimental reliance or promissory estoppel (R 2d 139).  The answer specifically says that this would be an alternative to simply noting that one party has fully performed (while the other party has not performed at all).

[Talk Is Cheap]

Hah, Contracts is over. I won't need my high school diploma, any more!