I like the British term 'bird' applied to a female. For that matter, I also like their use of the word 'fit' to mean 'hot'.
awkward follows you like a beer chasing a shot of tequila.
Quote from: comotellamas on December 03, 2008, 02:06:31 PMI like the British term 'bird' applied to a female. For that matter, I also like their use of the word 'fit' to mean 'hot'.ooh me too! I also liked it when this British boy told me I had a "nice bottom." It was so proper, I loled
Well he's had it in for me ever since I kinda ran over his dog... Well, replace the word "kinda" with "repeatedly" and the word "dog" with "son."
Quote from: tm. on December 03, 2008, 09:04:57 AMQuote from: non parata est on December 03, 2008, 08:53:51 AMIf "boys" is okay because "boys" and "men" are both humans, then why isn't "chicks" okay because both "chicks" and "female homo sapiens" are both animals?because the latter is dehumanizing, presumably.i once knew a lefty feminist who used the term "chicks" to refer to women. it confused the living hell out of me.I'm a lefty-ish feminist-ish person. I think taking your husband's name is sexist. I think a lot of marriage-related traditions are sexist. I think a lot of the ways that men speak to and about women are sexist. And I use the term chick all the time. My dearest female friend, a greater leftist and feminist than I, is not offended by the term. I found it interesting that the lecture I got about using that term was from a man.Chick is just old-fashioned slang. I wouldn't recommend someone speak that way at work, but I see nothing wrong with saying "this chick I met ...." I certainly wouldn't put chick in the same category of "offensive" as a lot of the words I see used for females, e.g. b-i-t-c-h, ho (or is it hoe?), whore, female private part. People use those terms all the time. The first two are even used when someone isn't intending to insult women.If a man's most un-gentlemanly attribute is referring to women as "chicks," I'd say that's a pretty great man (or boy, or guy, or dude).
Quote from: non parata est on December 03, 2008, 08:53:51 AMIf "boys" is okay because "boys" and "men" are both humans, then why isn't "chicks" okay because both "chicks" and "female homo sapiens" are both animals?because the latter is dehumanizing, presumably.i once knew a lefty feminist who used the term "chicks" to refer to women. it confused the living hell out of me.
If "boys" is okay because "boys" and "men" are both humans, then why isn't "chicks" okay because both "chicks" and "female homo sapiens" are both animals?
Quote from: dbgirl on December 03, 2008, 08:52:28 PMQuote from: tm. on December 03, 2008, 09:04:57 AMQuote from: non parata est on December 03, 2008, 08:53:51 AMIf "boys" is okay because "boys" and "men" are both humans, then why isn't "chicks" okay because both "chicks" and "female homo sapiens" are both animals?because the latter is dehumanizing, presumably.i once knew a lefty feminist who used the term "chicks" to refer to women. it confused the living hell out of me.I'm a lefty-ish feminist-ish person. I think taking your husband's name is sexist. I think a lot of marriage-related traditions are sexist. I think a lot of the ways that men speak to and about women are sexist. And I use the term chick all the time. My dearest female friend, a greater leftist and feminist than I, is not offended by the term. I found it interesting that the lecture I got about using that term was from a man.Chick is just old-fashioned slang. I wouldn't recommend someone speak that way at work, but I see nothing wrong with saying "this chick I met ...." I certainly wouldn't put chick in the same category of "offensive" as a lot of the words I see used for females, e.g. b-i-t-c-h, ho (or is it hoe?), whore, female private part. People use those terms all the time. The first two are even used when someone isn't intending to insult women.If a man's most un-gentlemanly attribute is referring to women as "chicks," I'd say that's a pretty great man (or boy, or guy, or dude). So tell me more about this expectations of how we the men ought to behave.
how about just "women" or "ladies?"or "babes" if they're especially foxy!
Quote from: zippyandzap on December 05, 2008, 05:26:46 PMhow about just "women" or "ladies?"or "babes" if they're especially foxy! I like early-mid 20th century terms for women:Like broads and trixies.
Yea “chicks” can be offensive, so I try whenever possible to avoid any misunderstanding and to use non loaded terms for women like: honey, female dog, and the ubiquitous “you people.”
I do not like hats.I do not like them on bats.I would not like them near cats.I would not like them made out of mats.