Their bar passage rates are terrible, so they need aggressive marketing to get students to go there. For two years running, Penn State-Dickinson has had the lowest bar passage rate for first-time takers of all seven law schools in Pennsylvania, including Widener-Harrisburg: 2007 bar passage:http://www.pabarexam.org/Bar_Examination/Statistics/pdfs/0707stats.pdf 2008 bar passage:http://www.pabarexam.org/Bar_Examination/Statistics/pdfs/0708stats.pdfHow is 80% terrible when the state rate is 83% and U Penn is 95% which obviously brings the average up?
Their bar passage rates are terrible, so they need aggressive marketing to get students to go there. For two years running, Penn State-Dickinson has had the lowest bar passage rate for first-time takers of all seven law schools in Pennsylvania, including Widener-Harrisburg: 2007 bar passage:http://www.pabarexam.org/Bar_Examination/Statistics/pdfs/0707stats.pdf 2008 bar passage:http://www.pabarexam.org/Bar_Examination/Statistics/pdfs/0708stats.pdf And the school's reputation score in US News given by judges and lawyers (that is, future employers), has actually gone DOWN.
As far as I can tell, there's no difference between tuition for in-state or out-of-state students... which to me makes no sense, since naturally PSU is a state school. Temple and Pitt are much better state school options, as they cost less and offer better job prospects.