Yeah I think it might be my best grade (which might speak badly about my other classes!), but it was without question the most miserable 32 hours of my life. It took me at least 8 hours and three-times-through reading the cases before I was able to figure out what the hell was going on. That reading was tough!Is anyone else going to bar review tonight?Also, on three occasions I thought for sure I figured out who you 2l/3l people were, and on each occasion I was totally wrong. I tried to ask kind of inconspicuous questions, and I completely failed each time! I apparently do not know you people.
Quote from: Refused Party Program on December 17, 2008, 12:06:39 AMIf you have a professor that stressed making a checklist (as mind did), I would take that to heart. In other words, use as much of the packet as possible. I didn't do this and my grade was crap. Weren't you in Bederman?He stressed a checklist? I only used half of the cases in the packet. My grade was pretty darned good.
If you have a professor that stressed making a checklist (as mind did), I would take that to heart. In other words, use as much of the packet as possible. I didn't do this and my grade was crap.
Quote from: Captain on December 19, 2008, 12:10:30 AMQuote from: Refused Party Program on December 17, 2008, 12:06:39 AMIf you have a professor that stressed making a checklist (as mind did), I would take that to heart. In other words, use as much of the packet as possible. I didn't do this and my grade was crap. Weren't you in Bederman?He stressed a checklist? I only used half of the cases in the packet. My grade was pretty darned good.Ha, well, it could have also just written a crappy exam. But yeah, there was a day where he talked about making a checklist. But, guess it doesn't matter now. The 1Ls are done, and its off to a fun semester of Con Law.
Rumor has it kids from Emory Law are running around Circuit City's (how the hell do you pluralize that? Solution: "around from Circuit City to Circuit City") making K breach threats/claims.
Quote from: Number81 on December 12, 2008, 07:47:36 PMI'd be interested in hearing the 2L's comments on the job issue, given current "conditions."Oh ok... well, since you pulled my leg, I'll take yet another break from studying...Most of the people that I know who are in the top 1/3 or so have a job lined up for the summer. Not all of those count as "BIGLAW," though, but I'd venture to guess that if you are in the top 1/3 and make a journal, you're in good shape, so long as you attack the bigger markets. I know of two people who are on a journal and don't have jobs. I think it had a lot to do with them skipping big markets and applying to niche markets that either cut back on hiring or that they didn't have a connection to, but honestly I am just guessing. The ATL jobs were seemingly unavailable if you had a strong connection to a geographic area outside of the southeast, however. I don't think many interviews were granted to people who had "New York, NY" listed anywhere on their resume, for example, regardless of rank. At least on the east coast, NY is the only market that doesn't seem to care about local connections at all. Even if you do have a connection to a market, it may not be strong enough (for example, I have a connection to Philadelphia through my undergrad, but apparently that wasn't convincing enough for Philly firms). RPP can probably do a better job of commenting on this, but I think the job market for Patent/IP lawyers is still pretty good. I don't think I know of any Enginerds who are unemployed at the moment. I don't, however, know every future patent lawyer at Emory.I've mentally excluded people from this analysis who want to work for the government, or small firms, or anything outside of BIG/MID-LAW. Those jobs might not be filled until next semester.
I'd be interested in hearing the 2L's comments on the job issue, given current "conditions."