Did you read the case in Crim where the guy fell asleep in his truck in his own driveway, with a bunch of empty beer cans on the passenger side?Claimed he was mad at his wife or something and went out there to drink, then passed out.He got off because they couldn't prove whether he was coming or going. No way to infer the driveway was the end of his trip rather than the beginning.
Quote from: piggy pop on September 03, 2008, 09:05:11 PMDid you read the case in Crim where the guy fell asleep in his truck in his own driveway, with a bunch of empty beer cans on the passenger side?Claimed he was mad at his wife or something and went out there to drink, then passed out.He got off because they couldn't prove whether he was coming or going. No way to infer the driveway was the end of his trip rather than the beginning.People get off all the time. What's the citation for that case? Whether the drunk was at the end or the beginning of his "trip," it would seem that the drunk still made or was about to make a "trip."
Get a sense of humor, Susan B. Anthony!
I'm going to cut a female dog. With a knife with a brown handle, natch.
Don't judge me. You've not had my life.
Why did you get in your car anyway?
awkward follows you like a beer chasing a shot of tequila.
Haha that was my point, I was wondering why he was in his car with the keys in if his friend dropped him off. Everyone else just beat me to the punchline
Quote from: offer on September 03, 2008, 09:15:24 PMQuote from: piggy pop on September 03, 2008, 09:05:11 PMDid you read the case in Crim where the guy fell asleep in his truck in his own driveway, with a bunch of empty beer cans on the passenger side?Claimed he was mad at his wife or something and went out there to drink, then passed out.He got off because they couldn't prove whether he was coming or going. No way to infer the driveway was the end of his trip rather than the beginning.People get off all the time. What's the citation for that case? Whether the drunk was at the end or the beginning of his "trip," it would seem that the drunk still made or was about to make a "trip."i suspect that it is Walek v. Commissioner of Public Safety, 361 N.W.2d 482 (Minn.App., 1985).
Quote from: Tasha Elizabeth on September 03, 2008, 10:02:52 PMQuote from: offer on September 03, 2008, 09:15:24 PMQuote from: piggy pop on September 03, 2008, 09:05:11 PMDid you read the case in Crim where the guy fell asleep in his truck in his own driveway, with a bunch of empty beer cans on the passenger side?Claimed he was mad at his wife or something and went out there to drink, then passed out.He got off because they couldn't prove whether he was coming or going. No way to infer the driveway was the end of his trip rather than the beginning.People get off all the time. What's the citation for that case? Whether the drunk was at the end or the beginning of his "trip," it would seem that the drunk still made or was about to make a "trip."i suspect that it is Walek v. Commissioner of Public Safety, 361 N.W.2d 482 (Minn.App., 1985).Actually the case is Owens v. State, 93 Md.App. 162 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1992). You should pay more attention in class because the defendant was found guilty by the trial court. This ruling was then affirmed by the appellate court.
Quote from: Holden Caulfield on September 03, 2008, 10:17:18 PMActually the case is Owens v. State, 93 Md.App. 162 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1992). You should pay more attention in class because the defendant was found guilty by the trial court. This ruling was then affirmed by the appellate court.Oh lord.
Actually the case is Owens v. State, 93 Md.App. 162 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1992). You should pay more attention in class because the defendant was found guilty by the trial court. This ruling was then affirmed by the appellate court.
I hate science because I refuse to assume that a discipline based in large part on the continual scrapping and renewal of ideas is unconditionally correct in a given area.