Lindbergh, thanks for the comment. i definately wouldn't say taking extra breaks is a great idea ... i'd guess it's in line with your idea to take untimed practice tests? surely people taking untimed tests take a lot of breaks. either way i'm satisfied with my score.
Quote from: comotellamas on August 15, 2008, 10:46:18 AM I suggest focusing on consistently scoring a raw score within a certain range. Shoot for the raw score that you need to get assuming the toughest curve possible. Try to get as many right as possible? Novel concept. What else Confucius?
I suggest focusing on consistently scoring a raw score within a certain range. Shoot for the raw score that you need to get assuming the toughest curve possible.
I belive my highest score was a 176, but I averaged around 171. I got a 166 on the lamest LSAT in the world - June '07. I'm focused on keeping my raw score consistently above 91. A given raw score corresponds to quite different scaled scores depending on the test, but given the historical data for scaled scores, a score of 91+ should equal at least 170. I suggest focusing on consistently scoring a raw score within a certain range. The 88 that I scored on the June LSAT only yielded a 166 while on some tests it would have gotten me a 171. Shoot for the raw score that you need to get assuming the toughest curve possible.
Quote from: Tetris on August 19, 2008, 04:56:30 PMQuote from: comotellamas on August 15, 2008, 10:46:18 AMI belive my highest score was a 176, but I averaged around 171. I got a 166 on the lamest LSAT in the world - June '07. I'm focused on keeping my raw score consistently above 91. A given raw score corresponds to quite different scaled scores depending on the test, but given the historical data for scaled scores, a score of 91+ should equal at least 170. I suggest focusing on consistently scoring a raw score within a certain range. The 88 that I scored on the June LSAT only yielded a 166 while on some tests it would have gotten me a 171. Shoot for the raw score that you need to get assuming the toughest curve possible. @#!* June 07.@#!* it.Such an insane curve. If it had been a standard scoring curve, I would've done as well as expected.While we are at it, 'F the police, 'F the government, 'F Walmart, 'F hood rats, 'F Exon and the other oil companies, 'F the banks. Crap we should just start a new Fight Club and do what they did.BTW, that lovely curve for June 07, although a bit more harsh that the other recent ones, is pretty typical of the way recent tests have been curved. So, back to my idea, if it is your first time at Fight Club, you have to fight!
Quote from: comotellamas on August 15, 2008, 10:46:18 AMI belive my highest score was a 176, but I averaged around 171. I got a 166 on the lamest LSAT in the world - June '07. I'm focused on keeping my raw score consistently above 91. A given raw score corresponds to quite different scaled scores depending on the test, but given the historical data for scaled scores, a score of 91+ should equal at least 170. I suggest focusing on consistently scoring a raw score within a certain range. The 88 that I scored on the June LSAT only yielded a 166 while on some tests it would have gotten me a 171. Shoot for the raw score that you need to get assuming the toughest curve possible. @#!* June 07.@#!* it.Such an insane curve. If it had been a standard scoring curve, I would've done as well as expected.