you know nothing about julie, except she know more about lsat than you.
Sure you do, Julie! And someday, when you graduate from your special school, maybe you'll actually take one! (Untimed, of course.)
She's so special!!! 
bluster not same as knowledge, as we all can see.
Yes, Julie, we can all see your bluster is completely baseless.
hey, preppy, tell us again about those norming data, eh?
oh, wait--you can't!
Have you linked to any alleged norming data yet, my geeky friend? I wasn't aware that you had.
Assuming such data exists, is it still your position that all testtakers find all questions equally difficult? And that there is no individual variance whatsoever in what kinds of questions, passages, and games different students struggle with?
Because if it is, I think you need to consider your position a little more thoughtfully. Or, you could just keep repeating the words "norming data" in a shrill tone, like an OCD parrot. Either way. 
julie want watch you twist in wind some more. your ignorance of publicly-released norming data bad enough, now being compounded by your failure/inability locate it.
remember, you postulated that there difficulty pattern in rc, but your "facts" simply wrong. thus, this obviate your attempt cover your tracks through your "personal interest" theory. where your data for either these, preppie?