Let's meet in here and talk about little things that bug us

[JeNeSaisLaw]

I still hate this thread

[,.,.,.;.,.,.]

Deeds are so boring, it's hard to get work done.  So waz up, OTB thread?

Let me re-print some of the outline I'm going over:

Grant (and the 3 elements of the first clause of the deed)
Description of Land (and the like nine-billion cases on how courts have read this)
Warranties of Title (there are 6)

I won't even go into notarial/recording stuff, or delivery.  Suffice it to say that you have to really love land transfers to dig this.

I still can't figure out whether this is mostly freehold estates stuff.

[Thistle]

Deeds are so boring, it's hard to get work done.  So waz up, OTB thread?

Let me re-print some of the outline I'm going over:

Grant (and the 3 elements of the first clause of the deed)
Description of Land (and the like nine-billion cases on how courts have read this)
Warranties of Title (there are 6)

I won't even go into notarial/recording stuff, or delivery.  Suffice it to say that you have to really love land transfers to dig this.

I still can't figure out whether this is mostly freehold estates stuff.

wally gdammit you need a girl to yalke your mind off this lawschool *&^%.  f-in deeds? on saturdays night?   jeswus.  i'de make yt9ou forget f-in deeds all right

[,.,.,.;.,.,.]

I don't know.  I just figured out Sweeney v. Sweeney and Rosengrant v. Rosengrant, and the problem of using a deed in place of a will.

Basically, deeds have to have immediate conveyance, or at least conveyance sometime before the grantor's death. 

After I finish with this, I'll go back to nuisance issues, because they're harder to understand in terms of liability/property rules, and I might re-read One View of the Cathedral, because I dunno about all that liability stuff.

. . .

Congrats on graduating with Honors, by the way!  You work for the city, right?  That sounds like a good job.

[Thistle]

I don't know.  I just figured out Sweeney v. Sweeney and Rosengrant v. Rosengrant, and the problem of using a deed in place of a will.

Basically, deeds have to have immediate conveyance, or at least conveyance sometime before the grantor's death. 

After I finish with this, I'll go back to nuisance issues, because they're harder to understand in terms of liability/property rules, and I might re-read One View of the Cathedral, because I dunno about all that liability stuff.

. . .

Congrats on graduating with Honors, by the way!  You work for the city, right?  That sounds like a good job.

thanks wally, and its not really the city, we get paid by whomever joins the legal defense thingy.....we qwualify for state benefits though.

you still need a girl.   too bad youre half my age you arfe smart and even kinda funny at times when youe3r not being too se4rious giggle

[,.,.,.;.,.,.]

Flattered, I guess.  I'm surprised that people assume, correctly, that I don't have a girlfriend.  I'm not sure why.

[Thistle]

Flattered, I guess.  I'm surprised that people assume, correctly, that I don't have a girlfriend.  I'm not sure why.

i guess? 

ok yeah i undersatnbd lol.

people dont thi8nk you have a gf because youre always on here talking about...f-ing cherminsky and deeds and *&^%

[JeNeSaisLaw]

Deeds are so boring, it's hard to get work done.  So waz up, OTB thread?

Let me re-print some of the outline I'm going over:

Grant (and the 3 elements of the first clause of the deed)
Description of Land (and the like nine-billion cases on how courts have read this)
Warranties of Title (there are 6)

I won't even go into notarial/recording stuff, or delivery.  Suffice it to say that you have to really love land transfers to dig this.

I still can't figure out whether this is mostly freehold estates stuff.

wally gdammit you need a girl to yalke your mind off this lawschool *&^%.  f-in deeds? on saturdays night?   jeswus.  i'de make yt9ou forget f-in deeds all right

I don't know.  I just figured out Sweeney v. Sweeney and Rosengrant v. Rosengrant, and the problem of using a deed in place of a will.

Basically, deeds have to have immediate conveyance, or at least conveyance sometime before the grantor's death. 

After I finish with this, I'll go back to nuisance issues, because they're harder to understand in terms of liability/property rules, and I might re-read One View of the Cathedral, because I dunno about all that liability stuff.

. . .

Congrats on graduating with Honors, by the way!  You work for the city, right?  That sounds like a good job.

thanks wally, and its not really the city, we get paid by whomever joins the legal defense thingy.....we qwualify for state benefits though.

you still need a girl.   too bad youre half my age you arfe smart and even kinda funny at times when youe3r not being too se4rious giggle

Preserved for posterity. This *&^% is too good.

[Thistle]

Deeds are so boring, it's hard to get work done.  So waz up, OTB thread?

Let me re-print some of the outline I'm going over:

Grant (and the 3 elements of the first clause of the deed)
Description of Land (and the like nine-billion cases on how courts have read this)
Warranties of Title (there are 6)

I won't even go into notarial/recording stuff, or delivery.  Suffice it to say that you have to really love land transfers to dig this.

I still can't figure out whether this is mostly freehold estates stuff.

wally gdammit you need a girl to yalke your mind off this lawschool poo.  f-in deeds? on saturdays night?   jeswus.  i'de make yt9ou forget f-in deeds all right

I don't know.  I just figured out Sweeney v. Sweeney and Rosengrant v. Rosengrant, and the problem of using a deed in place of a will.

Basically, deeds have to have immediate conveyance, or at least conveyance sometime before the grantor's death. 

After I finish with this, I'll go back to nuisance issues, because they're harder to understand in terms of liability/property rules, and I might re-read One View of the Cathedral, because I dunno about all that liability stuff.

. . .

Congrats on graduating with Honors, by the way!  You work for the city, right?  That sounds like a good job.

thanks wally, and its not really the city, we get paid by whomever joins the legal defense thingy.....we qwualify for state benefits though.

you still need a girl.   too bad youre half my age you arfe smart and even kinda funny at times when youe3r not being too se4rious giggle

Preserved for posterity. This poo is too good.

*&^%!! noooooo, i willr egrte this laters i knmow it!  dammit 

[Julie Fern]

relax. you not even sound like republican.