-graduate with the chance to enter biglaw and suffer the hours and pay. -chance at federal or state law clerk positions-if not big law... at least a law firm (medium size) that pays at least 70k pref. 80k up starting.. -areas of legal interest : Wills and Estates, Family law, PI, crim defense.. real practical law.. I'm not looking at international law or to change the world, just real law that I can turn around and apply to my own solo practice (something I intend to do in the future, but who knows).-NOTE: the minimum I am willing to accept on my first real law job would be 70k up
so does this mean there are NO NONE ZERO chance of getting a law position between 70-90k job starting out? even if say we scored in the top quarter of the class?
Quote so does this mean there are NO NONE ZERO chance of getting a law position between 70-90k job starting out? even if say we scored in the top quarter of the class?Of course not, no. What it means is that the bulk of employers who hire on a regular basis (see above + biglaw) don't pay in that range. I've heard of people getting salaries in the 70-90 range (botique firms, coporations, employers hiring people w/ some significant work experience), but it's not something to bank on. See this link:http://www.elsblog.org/the_empirical_legal_studi/2007/09/distribution-of.htmlMy point is that many students reason to themselves that if the elite of the class will get $100k + jobs, then the middle of the class probably gets between $80-100k starting salaries. It doesn't work that way. US News adds to the confusion because they usually list average starting salaries in the 80 - 90's range for T2's and lower T1's. These figures are skewed by the eye popping salaries for those on the top and those starting out with $35 per hour contract jobs but who often move on to more stable (but less lucrative work.In short, don't go to law school expecting a great starting salary unless you end up at the top of the class.
Quote from: lawnecon on July 21, 2008, 06:35:04 PMQuote so does this mean there are NO NONE ZERO chance of getting a law position between 70-90k job starting out? even if say we scored in the top quarter of the class?Of course not, no. What it means is that the bulk of employers who hire on a regular basis (see above + biglaw) don't pay in that range. I've heard of people getting salaries in the 70-90 range (botique firms, coporations, employers hiring people w/ some significant work experience), but it's not something to bank on. See this link:http://www.elsblog.org/the_empirical_legal_studi/2007/09/distribution-of.htmlMy point is that many students reason to themselves that if the elite of the class will get $100k + jobs, then the middle of the class probably gets between $80-100k starting salaries. It doesn't work that way. US News adds to the confusion because they usually list average starting salaries in the 80 - 90's range for T2's and lower T1's. These figures are skewed by the eye popping salaries for those on the top and those starting out with $35 per hour contract jobs but who often move on to more stable (but less lucrative work.In short, don't go to law school expecting a great starting salary unless you end up at the top of the class.Please stop infesting the 0L class with your lack of knowledge of the SD legal market. You have never lived here and you have no knowledge of USD or its placement. You are just spewing generalizations based on a magazines rating of a school without knowledge of the truth. Please disregard lawnecon's comments as he has no (zero) experience with USD or the SD market. StevePirates and theor have the more correct responses.