Kaplan LSAT Summer Intensive Program

[Maclock]

Does anyone know people who have taken the following program?  I'm trying to figure out if it's worth the outrageous price.  There is no decent test prep (in either tutor or course form) in the city where I currently reside, and I may have to do something like take this kind of program to prep properly for the LSAT.  Self-prep is not an option.  The LSAT is the very bane of my existence.   

http://www.kaptest.com/Law/LSAT/Kaplan-Programs/Summer-Intensive/lsat-summer-intensive.html

[Mori]

Good catch Chili!

This supports the majority view on Kaplan prep course. A waste of time & money. No doubt it is because they hire idiots like Matlock.

[FatUncle]

He might be a shill for someone, but how in the world could you read his post and conclude it's Kaplan?  He calls their prices 'outrageous' and asserts that there is no decent test prep in the city (in other words, Kaplan doesn't constitute 'decent').  Some advert.  I think I'll sign up for Kaplan's program after that rousing endorsement. 

[FatUncle]

If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it is a fing duck!  DoH!

That's my point, dimwit.  It walks like a duck but it doesn't quack like one.  There is not a single positive thing said in his post about Kaplan.  There are several negative things said.  Is that some new form of advertising I haven't heard of?  Trash the company you're 'advertising' for?  If someone came on here and called Obama a muslim terrorist, would you start crying out that the person is a shill for Barack's campaign?  He could just as easily be a shill from some other company who wanted to start a thread bashing Kaplan.  That sounds a little more plausible than insulting a company in some backwards attempt to advertise its 'outrageously' expensive summer program.   

[Mori]

Either way, the post appears deceptive given what the OP has posted in the past (attending NW in '06)

Oh....and I just love how it is assumed he/she is a guy   

[Willy Beachum]

Oh....and I just love how it is assumed he/she is a guy   

Yes, yes, yes, we should have assume he-- ahem, she-- is a girl. That would have been a much better assumption.

I say we assume he/she is a he-she in order to be more fair.

[Julie Fern]

estrogen beat testosterone every time.

[Julie Fern]

bring it on, girlie-man.