I have been reading a book recommended by my school, which is okay: Law School Without Fear (by the Shapos (first names escape me now). It can be boring and VERY basic sometimes, but it has helped to calm my nerves and I think I will actually use some of the advice. Also, I read Law School Confidential and it has some good suggestions for studying, briefing, etc.I tried to do some CALI lessons online, but there's really no point, since I have no idea what they are talking about yet!!! But, as far as actual substantive reading on subjects, I tend to think others, like jeffislouie, have the right idea. It seems counterproductive.BUT- I got an AP Prep book on economics and it is good stuff. It is kind of blah, but for a philosophy major, like me, it helps put a different spin on things. Also, I hear that economics is a good foundation to have for Torts, and that since economic issues underlie a lot of policy, it helps to be fresh with it.Just a note- I spend a lot of time at the pool swimming, because much of the advice I've gotten suggests starting an exercise regime if you do not already have one!!!
Jeff ,Im not trying to be "that guy " in class . I was never the hand raising type and def not a know it all in High School or College , so I cant imagine that changing in law school . Im just trying to come in ahead of the game and maybe save myself a little bit of time while in school by prepping before it .What year are you in school ? Did you prep before you went and did you find it didnt help you at all ?
Jacy ,What would you suggest would do me an iota of good ?? Not being sarcastic....id just like to know your opinion Thanks
Quote from: philosophia on June 07, 2008, 10:03:29 PMI have been reading a book recommended by my school, which is okay: Law School Without Fear (by the Shapos (first names escape me now). It can be boring and VERY basic sometimes, but it has helped to calm my nerves and I think I will actually use some of the advice. Also, I read Law School Confidential and it has some good suggestions for studying, briefing, etc.I tried to do some CALI lessons online, but there's really no point, since I have no idea what they are talking about yet!!! But, as far as actual substantive reading on subjects, I tend to think others, like jeffislouie, have the right idea. It seems counterproductive.BUT- I got an AP Prep book on economics and it is good stuff. It is kind of blah, but for a philosophy major, like me, it helps put a different spin on things. Also, I hear that economics is a good foundation to have for Torts, and that since economic issues underlie a lot of policy, it helps to be fresh with it.Just a note- I spend a lot of time at the pool swimming, because much of the advice I've gotten suggests starting an exercise regime if you do not already have one!!! That book (Law school without fear) is by far the worst thing I've ever read. My law school made it a requirement. It stinks. Poorly written, it doesn't tell you much of anything while claiming to be this fantastic tool. It's crap. Written by two lawyers (law profs? not sure anymore) with an inflated sense of self. I hate that book.Starting an excercise routine is an excellent idea. Develop that habit now or you'll get rounder. Or skinnier.
Most of the current students I have talked to have told me that they, after a few weeks, learned to read a supplement to understand the black letter law prior to reading the assigned cases so that they understood what was happening. The supplements suggested have ranged from commercial outlines to E&Es to hornbooks. I visited several schools and sat in on classes at most of them.. I don't recall the black letter law being explained in any of the sessions. The discussion revolved almost entirely on application. The impression I got was that the students were expected to already know the elements that compose the black letter law on the topic to be discussed and should come to class expecting to focus on the finer details and ambiguities. Is this generally the case? If so, I'm not understanding how a student will be harmed by reading the basic elements of what constitutes tort x ahead of time. If the bulk of these topics are not going to be explained, just applied, how is waiting until the first day of class going to be any different than reading the material a few months ahead of time?