Law School Discussion

Nine Years of Discussion
;

Author Topic: Cops (TV Show)  (Read 1263 times)

nealric

  • Global Moderator
  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 2261
  • a.k.a. Miguel Sanchez
    • View Profile
Re: Cops (TV Show)
« Reply #10 on: May 09, 2008, 10:45:22 PM »
Quote

I agree.  But the reality is, if they want to search your car and you say "no thanks" you'll be there all night - and ultimately they're gonna find some plausible reason to search.       
 

At least when they do you will have a legal argument to suppress the fruits search.
Once they have consent, it's game over.
Georgetown Law Graduate

Chief justice Earl Warren wasn't a stripper!
Now who's being naive?

ronaldo699

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 59
    • View Profile
Re: Cops (TV Show)
« Reply #11 on: May 10, 2008, 01:01:22 AM »
my crim pro prof (capra) said the only way that this show goes on when it shows footage in people's houses is w/ signed consent

slacker

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 949
    • View Profile
Re: Cops (TV Show)
« Reply #12 on: May 10, 2008, 09:17:53 AM »
They'd need signed consent for anyone on TV. The occasional blurred face shows that not everyone consents, but a lot of people do.

One of the people in my crim pro class was a cop. He said they'd always do a weapons patdown, regardless, because the last thing they wanted was to be taken unaware by the person they were questioning. Not quite 4th A...but I can see his point.

nealric

  • Global Moderator
  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 2261
  • a.k.a. Miguel Sanchez
    • View Profile
Re: Cops (TV Show)
« Reply #13 on: May 10, 2008, 12:12:13 PM »
Quote
Not quite 4th A...but I can see his point.

Courts are pretty permissive on Terry frisks.

All the cop needs is some articulable reason for a suspicion that suspect might be armed and dangerous. Pretty much anything will fly in most circuits. They can usually get by with "He looked nervous"
Georgetown Law Graduate

Chief justice Earl Warren wasn't a stripper!
Now who's being naive?