Let me put it this way... if there is a former car insurance claims adjuster here, that person may be able to give some insight into the usual division of liability in such a case without necessarily utilizing any of the knowledge gained from their studies at law school. Hence, you are giving advice from an insurance claims adjuster standpoint, not really a law student standpoint.
I am not looking for an "explanation" of my chunk of liability... seeing as how I do not know what the "chunk" or percentage of liability is my own. I am looking to see if anyone else has any thoughts on how the scale can tip, from an adjuster's perspective.
Taking into consideration the details of the accident, is this still considered a 50/50 type of case?