Quote from: Christopher Moltisanti on April 30, 2008, 10:36:54 PMQuote from: Law Boy on April 30, 2008, 10:35:42 PMUSNWR is a joke. People salivate over arbitrary rankings. The most foolish part is that it is an established consensus among EVERYONE that rankings are overrated and arbitrarily contrived but we still remain obsequious to them.Note: Out of the reputation calculation which combined accounts for 40% of the ranking is made up of surveys sent in by LESS THAN 10% of those surveyed. Now lets go adjust our lives for the outcome. The ABA should publicly denounce the USNWR ranking and let firms and attorneys make up their own conceptions of schools and their alumni.I somehow doubt firms pay that much attention to USNWR They pay attention to everything believe me, including the LSAT scores required to get into schools. I saw a legal recruiters book once, and it included a list of schools and their median LSAT scores. This is what she looked at to give me advice, so yeah, they are paying attention.
Quote from: Law Boy on April 30, 2008, 10:35:42 PMUSNWR is a joke. People salivate over arbitrary rankings. The most foolish part is that it is an established consensus among EVERYONE that rankings are overrated and arbitrarily contrived but we still remain obsequious to them.Note: Out of the reputation calculation which combined accounts for 40% of the ranking is made up of surveys sent in by LESS THAN 10% of those surveyed. Now lets go adjust our lives for the outcome. The ABA should publicly denounce the USNWR ranking and let firms and attorneys make up their own conceptions of schools and their alumni.I somehow doubt firms pay that much attention to USNWR
USNWR is a joke. People salivate over arbitrary rankings. The most foolish part is that it is an established consensus among EVERYONE that rankings are overrated and arbitrarily contrived but we still remain obsequious to them.Note: Out of the reputation calculation which combined accounts for 40% of the ranking is made up of surveys sent in by LESS THAN 10% of those surveyed. Now lets go adjust our lives for the outcome. The ABA should publicly denounce the USNWR ranking and let firms and attorneys make up their own conceptions of schools and their alumni.
Quote from: greenie on April 30, 2008, 11:49:59 PMQuote from: Christopher Moltisanti on April 30, 2008, 10:36:54 PMQuote from: Law Boy on April 30, 2008, 10:35:42 PMUSNWR is a joke. People salivate over arbitrary rankings. The most foolish part is that it is an established consensus among EVERYONE that rankings are overrated and arbitrarily contrived but we still remain obsequious to them.Note: Out of the reputation calculation which combined accounts for 40% of the ranking is made up of surveys sent in by LESS THAN 10% of those surveyed. Now lets go adjust our lives for the outcome. The ABA should publicly denounce the USNWR ranking and let firms and attorneys make up their own conceptions of schools and their alumni.I somehow doubt firms pay that much attention to USNWR They pay attention to everything believe me, including the LSAT scores required to get into schools. I saw a legal recruiters book once, and it included a list of schools and their median LSAT scores. This is what she looked at to give me advice, so yeah, they are paying attention.I'm saying recruitment at a school like Chicago has probably not been negatively impacted by Chicago being ranked 7th instead of 6th. And I doubt recruiters care if Mich is 8 one year and 10 the next.
It is true, I work for a Big Law firm here in DC and they even told me that if I can get into a top 25, or maybe even a top 50, I would be guaranteed a job here (since the partner here loves me from working for her for over 5 years). These people, even the partner whom I've worked for at this firm and another Big Law firm, realize that I know everything the attorneys I work for know. They realize that I can pretty much run these transactional deals on my known if I could. And yet, if I can't get into a Top 25 school, I can't get a job here. How's that for USN&WR influence? I am not so sure that would have been the case 20-25 years ago.
Quote from: Christopher Moltisanti on May 01, 2008, 12:02:00 AMQuote from: greenie on April 30, 2008, 11:49:59 PMQuote from: Christopher Moltisanti on April 30, 2008, 10:36:54 PMQuote from: Law Boy on April 30, 2008, 10:35:42 PMUSNWR is a joke. People salivate over arbitrary rankings. The most foolish part is that it is an established consensus among EVERYONE that rankings are overrated and arbitrarily contrived but we still remain obsequious to them.Note: Out of the reputation calculation which combined accounts for 40% of the ranking is made up of surveys sent in by LESS THAN 10% of those surveyed. Now lets go adjust our lives for the outcome. The ABA should publicly denounce the USNWR ranking and let firms and attorneys make up their own conceptions of schools and their alumni.I somehow doubt firms pay that much attention to USNWR They pay attention to everything believe me, including the LSAT scores required to get into schools. I saw a legal recruiters book once, and it included a list of schools and their median LSAT scores. This is what she looked at to give me advice, so yeah, they are paying attention.I'm saying recruitment at a school like Chicago has probably not been negatively impacted by Chicago being ranked 7th instead of 6th. And I doubt recruiters care if Mich is 8 one year and 10 the next.Hi who said I was talking about the T14?! The OP was mainly talking about non-T14 schools.
Quote from: greenie on May 01, 2008, 09:39:40 AMQuote from: Christopher Moltisanti on May 01, 2008, 12:02:00 AMQuote from: greenie on April 30, 2008, 11:49:59 PMQuote from: Christopher Moltisanti on April 30, 2008, 10:36:54 PMQuote from: Law Boy on April 30, 2008, 10:35:42 PMUSNWR is a joke. People salivate over arbitrary rankings. The most foolish part is that it is an established consensus among EVERYONE that rankings are overrated and arbitrarily contrived but we still remain obsequious to them.Note: Out of the reputation calculation which combined accounts for 40% of the ranking is made up of surveys sent in by LESS THAN 10% of those surveyed. Now lets go adjust our lives for the outcome. The ABA should publicly denounce the USNWR ranking and let firms and attorneys make up their own conceptions of schools and their alumni.I somehow doubt firms pay that much attention to USNWR They pay attention to everything believe me, including the LSAT scores required to get into schools. I saw a legal recruiters book once, and it included a list of schools and their median LSAT scores. This is what she looked at to give me advice, so yeah, they are paying attention.I'm saying recruitment at a school like Chicago has probably not been negatively impacted by Chicago being ranked 7th instead of 6th. And I doubt recruiters care if Mich is 8 one year and 10 the next.Hi who said I was talking about the T14?! The OP was mainly talking about non-T14 schools.I was talking about the "T14," sorry. I was talking about biglaw.
I am truly fed up with this message board. Are all of you so deeply obsessed with T14 schools that you cannot even fathom that 180+ other schools exist? Since I am the OP, re-read my second post:"I think it's a given that the top 14 schools have ALWAYS been the top 14. I should clarify my question and ask what about the rest of the 180+ schools (granted, some of them are fairly new)? How were they "classified" by the legal community without the USN&WR? For hypothetical purposes, lets say there were only 100 law schools 25 years ago (I have no idea, just shooting off the top of my head) and lets NOT TALK ABOUT THE T14 SCHOOLS FOR ONE MOMENT ON THIS MESSAGE BOARD (sheesh!), how did firms match up a Wisconsin versus an Illinois, or a Washington-St.Louis versus University of Texas?"Most law students do not go to T14 schools and that was exactly my point in posting my questions. And yet, all of you just can't help but revert back to T14 talk. This website should be called "Top 14 Law Schools Discussion," or better yet, "95% of All Other Law Schools Suck Discussion."
For hypothetical purposes, lets say there were only 100 law schools 25 years ago (I have no idea, just shooting off the top of my head) and lets NOT TALK ABOUT THE T14 SCHOOLS FOR ONE MOMENT ON THIS MESSAGE BOARD (sheesh!), how did firms match up a Wisconsin versus an Illinois, or a Washington-St.Louis versus University of Texas?"