Law School Discussion

Nine Years of Discussion
;

Author Topic: Guantanamo Detention Facility  (Read 5410 times)

wrmusgro

  • Guest
Re: Guantanamo Detention Facility
« Reply #70 on: June 15, 2005, 08:22:06 PM »
where you been, baby?

Well if it isn't the return of the 300 pound Cheetos eating machine. Hi Julie, and guess what? You f*cking suck.

SleepyGuyYawn

  • Guest
Re: Guantanamo Detention Facility
« Reply #71 on: June 15, 2005, 08:27:11 PM »
I already responded to this.  With your lack of ability to handle complex thought it's stunning that you're attempting law school.

sublimation

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 125
    • View Profile
Re: Guantanamo Detention Facility
« Reply #72 on: June 15, 2005, 11:22:41 PM »

war=suspected terrorist=guilty terrorist=not getting out any time soon. any questions?


just one:  so a person captured during war...what would that be?  it couldn't be a POW, could it? 


Julie Fern

  • LSD Obsessed
  • *****
  • Posts: 27216
  • hillary clinton say "boo!"
    • View Profile
Re: Guantanamo Detention Facility
« Reply #73 on: June 16, 2005, 07:59:22 AM »
On another note, does anyone really want to bring these guys into our civilian justice system?

Are we really going to have a trial, call in the US soldiers to testify about their actions on the battlefield and what they saw and how they captured the enemy? What if the soldiers did not marandize (sp) him before questioning? Speaking of questioning...should we give them civilian attorneys before any takes place.

Do we want to give a propaganda platform to these extremists? Can they sue our soldiers for their actions?

Just some questions.


sort of hearing required by courts looks to be minimal.  however, government would be required to provide at least some rationale for detention.

hearing may well be closed to public due to classified information being used, but even if not, who's afraid to let them speak?  it just as good chance for u.s. to show what these people supposedly did.  (assuming that's what eveidence shows, of course.)

and no, soldiers have no civil liability.

Julie Fern

  • LSD Obsessed
  • *****
  • Posts: 27216
  • hillary clinton say "boo!"
    • View Profile
Re: Guantanamo Detention Facility
« Reply #74 on: June 16, 2005, 08:01:47 AM »
where you been, baby?

Well if it isn't the return of the 300 pound Cheetos eating machine. Hi Julie, and guess what? You f*cking suck.

like you would know, pretend soldier-man.

Julie Fern

  • LSD Obsessed
  • *****
  • Posts: 27216
  • hillary clinton say "boo!"
    • View Profile
Re: Guantanamo Detention Facility
« Reply #75 on: June 16, 2005, 08:03:40 AM »

war=suspected terrorist=guilty terrorist=not getting out any time soon. any questions?


just one: so a person captured during war...what would that be? it couldn't be a POW, could it?



all our prisoners out-of-uniform combatants not covered by geneva conventions who very guilty, which why we much too good to prove it.  (and why we let hundreds go when courts said we had to prove it.  always sign of quality evidence!)

UOlaw08

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 34
    • AOL Instant Messenger - psikadelik
    • View Profile
Re: Guantanamo Detention Facility
« Reply #76 on: June 16, 2005, 10:55:57 AM »
Here are some articles that should help shed some light on some of the claims that have been made in this thread. The information contained in the first article was compiled by the AP after reviewing over 1000 pages released by a FOIA request placed in November 2004.

1. Not all Gitmo detainees were found on the battlefield shooting or attacking US troops.

(http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory?id=780520)

2. A number of detainees have been reported to be minors

(http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/13/politics/13gitmo.html)

3. At least 150 detainees have been released from Guantanamo (without official explanation)

(http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6929947/)

4. Four british detainees were released from Gitmo in 2004 without being charged with terrorism. One of them was a law student and a father of four. Their individual accounts are linked below.

(http://newswww.bbc.net.uk/1/hi/uk/4163911.stm)
ATTENDING: The University of Oregon!

In: Oregon
Out: Miami, Texas, IU: Bloomington, Lewis and Clark, Seattle
Withdrawn: Depaul, Denver, Quinnipiac

Julie Fern

  • LSD Obsessed
  • *****
  • Posts: 27216
  • hillary clinton say "boo!"
    • View Profile
Re: Guantanamo Detention Facility
« Reply #77 on: June 16, 2005, 12:18:11 PM »
helpful post, although knuckleheads not believe it.

wrmusgro

  • Guest
Re: Guantanamo Detention Facility
« Reply #78 on: June 30, 2005, 08:51:05 PM »
Here are some articles that should help shed some light on some of the claims that have been made in this thread. The information contained in the first article was compiled by the AP after reviewing over 1000 pages released by a FOIA request placed in November 2004.

1. Not all Gitmo detainees were found on the battlefield shooting or attacking US troops.

(http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory?id=780520)

2. A number of detainees have been reported to be minors

(http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/13/politics/13gitmo.html)

3. At least 150 detainees have been released from Guantanamo (without official explanation)

(http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6929947/)

4. Four british detainees were released from Gitmo in 2004 without being charged with terrorism. One of them was a law student and a father of four. Their individual accounts are linked below.

(http://newswww.bbc.net.uk/1/hi/uk/4163911.stm)

It would appear that you are skewing the argument into your favor? Why don't you offer some opposing views as well?

wrmusgro

  • Guest
Re: Guantanamo Detention Facility
« Reply #79 on: June 30, 2005, 08:55:35 PM »
where you been, baby?

Well if it isn't the return of the 300 pound Cheetos eating machine. Hi Julie, and guess what? You f*cking suck.

like you would know, pretend soldier-man.

Last I checked I served six months in the Persian Gulf with the 15th MEU before this little war even started. What about you? Where were you at in the year 2000? High School? If you doubt my service I suppose I could fax you a copy of my DD-214. Where should I send it to? McDonalds? Shut the fu*k up Julie and get a life before I come through this computer screen and B*tch slap you.......Sow.